1975
DOI: 10.2307/144823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Returns to Investments in Higher Education: Some New Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, education may not enhance an individual productivity but merely serves as an identification device to estimate the individual's productive capability (Albrecht & Ours 2006). A study undertaken by Raymond & Sesnowitz (1975) indicated that obtaining a tertiary education degree does not fully explain the increase in productivity of the particular worker but partially play as a screening device for employer. This finding is supported by Riley (2001) and Gullason (2011) where they found that employers tend to use education obtained by the applicants as a screening device to signal their market value; and therefore implies that individual may invest in education just to provide signals to their future employers of their higher ability in comparison to others who are without higher education credentials.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, education may not enhance an individual productivity but merely serves as an identification device to estimate the individual's productive capability (Albrecht & Ours 2006). A study undertaken by Raymond & Sesnowitz (1975) indicated that obtaining a tertiary education degree does not fully explain the increase in productivity of the particular worker but partially play as a screening device for employer. This finding is supported by Riley (2001) and Gullason (2011) where they found that employers tend to use education obtained by the applicants as a screening device to signal their market value; and therefore implies that individual may invest in education just to provide signals to their future employers of their higher ability in comparison to others who are without higher education credentials.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kastner (1977) found that direct returns to students with community college education represented an annually compounded interest rate of 5.6 percent for males and 5.88 percent for females. Raymond and Sesnowitz (1975) found rates of return for community college students to range between 16.8 percent for white males to 2.2 percent for nonwhite males. These and other studies support the conclusion that if employment opportunities remain stable for students with community college education, return rates should remain steady or increase over the short range.…”
Section: Economic Gains and Community College Attendancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countries over the world paid particular attention to the education sector in general and higher education in particular, in order to achieve their objectives. These goals consist principally of the community service and upgrading its civilization height, as well as providing the state by the different specialists, technicians and experts in various fields (Richard Raymond and Michael Sesnowitz, 1975;Walter W. McMahon, 1975;Jane Louise Johnson, 1978;Gary Rhoades, 1983;Kent Hill et al, 2005;Sandy Baum & Kathleen Payea, 2005). Therefore, the university could be considered as the main source of investment as the human wealth is considered as the most important and expensive fortunes of a society (David Post et al, 2004;Joy Murray, 2007;Christian Schierenbeck, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%