2017
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1311867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The return of the plantation? Historical and contemporary trends in the relation between plantations and smallholdings in Southeast Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although H. brasiliensis originates from the Amazon basin, Southeast Asian countries (Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam) and India account for more than 90% of the 11.5 million ha of rubber plantations worldwide (FAOSTAT 2016). Contrary to common belief, most rubber farms are smallholdings rather than large estates belonging to agri-business companies (Bissonnette and De Koninck 2017). The NR sector is thereby an important source of income for millions of people as rubber harvesting and its initial transformation are labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although H. brasiliensis originates from the Amazon basin, Southeast Asian countries (Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam) and India account for more than 90% of the 11.5 million ha of rubber plantations worldwide (FAOSTAT 2016). Contrary to common belief, most rubber farms are smallholdings rather than large estates belonging to agri-business companies (Bissonnette and De Koninck 2017). The NR sector is thereby an important source of income for millions of people as rubber harvesting and its initial transformation are labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our results further align with research in other tropical landscapes where commercial tree-based plantations have led to forest conversion, such as Peninsular Malaysia [114], Indonesia [114][115][116], Latin America [117], and Africa [9,118] for oil palm; and China [119][120][121][122] and Cambodia [123] for rubber. The expansion of these plantations in many tropical landscapes has been made possible due to the global demand for agricultural commodities, foreign direct investment, supportive government policies and programs, and the need to secure socio-economic benefits for local communities (e.g., [119,[124][125][126][127]). Shrub/Orchard largely contributed to the changes in forest and plantation expansion (Table 8; Figure 4).…”
Section: Twenty-year Land and Forest Cover Change In Tanintharyi Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent oil palm smallholders quickly emerged once the benefits of oil palm cultivation by scheme farmers became obvious. Mills started buying produce outside their plasma and own plantations, and basic infrastructure developed by logging, plantation, and mineral oil companies opened up lands that were previously uneconomic to develop [103,104]. Findings from Jambi indicate that direct economic profits of independent oil palm plantations were significantly higher than forests [105].…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Expansion Amongst Oil Palm Smallholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%