2010
DOI: 10.1657/1938-4246-42.1.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Response of Taku and Lemon Creek Glaciers to Climate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The disproportionately high mass loss from marineterminating glaciers is in stark contrast with mass loss from the adjacent Juneau Icefield to the north (e.g., Melkonian et al, 2014) where the flux from marine-terminating glaciers is essentially zero. This is in part because the only "marine-terminating" glacier on the Juneau Icefield, Taku, has developed a terminal moraine through excavation of proglacial sediments that prevents it from calving (e.g., Criscitiello et al, 2010). The lack of calving and high AAR (Accumulation Area Ratio-the fraction of the glacier that is in the accumulation zone) of Taku Glacier both contribute to mass gain and advance there (e.g., Larsen et al, 2007;Pelto et al, 2008;Truffer et al, 2009;Criscitiello et al, 2010;Melkonian et al, 2014;Larsen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Thinning At Marine Vs Land-terminating Glaciersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The disproportionately high mass loss from marineterminating glaciers is in stark contrast with mass loss from the adjacent Juneau Icefield to the north (e.g., Melkonian et al, 2014) where the flux from marine-terminating glaciers is essentially zero. This is in part because the only "marine-terminating" glacier on the Juneau Icefield, Taku, has developed a terminal moraine through excavation of proglacial sediments that prevents it from calving (e.g., Criscitiello et al, 2010). The lack of calving and high AAR (Accumulation Area Ratio-the fraction of the glacier that is in the accumulation zone) of Taku Glacier both contribute to mass gain and advance there (e.g., Larsen et al, 2007;Pelto et al, 2008;Truffer et al, 2009;Criscitiello et al, 2010;Melkonian et al, 2014;Larsen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Thinning At Marine Vs Land-terminating Glaciersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in part because the only "marine-terminating" glacier on the Juneau Icefield, Taku, has developed a terminal moraine through excavation of proglacial sediments that prevents it from calving (e.g., Criscitiello et al, 2010). The lack of calving and high AAR (Accumulation Area Ratio-the fraction of the glacier that is in the accumulation zone) of Taku Glacier both contribute to mass gain and advance there (e.g., Larsen et al, 2007;Pelto et al, 2008;Truffer et al, 2009;Criscitiello et al, 2010;Melkonian et al, 2014;Larsen et al, 2015). Thus, Taku is another example of a marine-terminating glacier that has a disproportionately large effect on the total mass balance an icefield, just like the four large outlet glaciers at Stikine.…”
Section: Thinning At Marine Vs Land-terminating Glaciersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taku Glacier is noteworthy for its positive annual mass balance from 1946-1988, which resulted from the cessation of calving around 1950 (Pelto and Miller, 1990). The positive mass balance resulting from this dynamic change with calving cessation gives the glacier an unusually high AAR (accumulation area ratio: percentage of glacier in accumulation zone at end of hydrologic year) for a non-calving glacier and makes the glacier relatively insensitive to climate change (Miller and Pelto, 1999;Pelto et al, 2008;Criscitiello, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Taku Glaciermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive mass balance resulting from this dynamic change gives the glacier an unusually high AAR (accumulation area ratio: percentage of glacier in accumulation zone at end of hydrologic year) for a non-calving glacier and makes the glacier relatively insensitive to climate change (Miller and Pelto, 1990;Pelto et al, 2008;Criscitiello, et al, 2010). The positive mass balance is continuing to drive its advance (Pelto and Miller, 1990;Post and Motyka, 1995;Pelto et al, 2008), while all other outlet glaciers of the Juneau Icefield are retreating, and during a period when alpine glacier mass balance globally has been dominantly negative (Zemp et al, 2009).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%