1999
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The resolving power of seismic amplitude data: An anisotropic inversion/migration approach

Abstract: A description of the theory and numerical implementation of a 3-D linearized asymptotic anisotropic inversion method based on the generalized Radon transform is given. We discuss implementation aspects, including (1) the use of various coordinate systems, (2) regularization by both spectral and Bayesian statistical techniques, and (3) the effects of limited acquisition apertures on inversion. We give applications of the theory in which well‐resolved parameter combinations are determined for particular experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifiable combinations of parameters can be divided into two groups -the first three Resolution of P −wave orthorhombic inversion 21 singular vectors show slightly higher sensitivity than the other three, which is in agreement with de Hoop et al (1999). The most interesting fact is that, despite previously published works (de Hoop et al 1999;Oh & Alkhalifah 2016), in the case of perfect illumination, the gap in this standard parameterization is within one order of magnitude and all six parameters can principally be determined, granted good quality data. Finally, we set the threshold for the resolution matrix to 0.1 of the highest singular value (this corresponds to the eigen values of the Hessian above 0.01) and create the resolution matrix for this case.…”
Section: Ij ρ Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Identifiable combinations of parameters can be divided into two groups -the first three Resolution of P −wave orthorhombic inversion 21 singular vectors show slightly higher sensitivity than the other three, which is in agreement with de Hoop et al (1999). The most interesting fact is that, despite previously published works (de Hoop et al 1999;Oh & Alkhalifah 2016), in the case of perfect illumination, the gap in this standard parameterization is within one order of magnitude and all six parameters can principally be determined, granted good quality data. Finally, we set the threshold for the resolution matrix to 0.1 of the highest singular value (this corresponds to the eigen values of the Hessian above 0.01) and create the resolution matrix for this case.…”
Section: Ij ρ Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In the standard parameterization, we see two levels of singular values very clearly (de Hoop et al 1999), yet the levels are within one order of magnitude. All six independently determinable parameters have approximately the same impact on the data and, thus, all of them can be determined in well-illuminated areas (Fig.…”
Section: Hierarchical Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the case of a point scatterer δρ(K) = const, δĉ i jkl (K) = const, equation 2 provides the radiation pattern or scattering function of these scatterers (Eaton and Stewart, 1994;de Hoop et al, 1999;Shaw and Sen, 2004). Under the plane-wave and Born applicability assumptions, equation 2 generalizes the point scatterer radiation patterns to arbitrary perturbations.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%