2003
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full Wavefield Inversion of Anisotropic Elastic Parameters in the Time Domain

Abstract: By the finite element equation of anisotropic elastic waves, an expression to directly calculate the Jacobian matrix is derived, which is the same as the finite element forward modeling equation in form. Therefore, all of the elements of Jacobian matrix can be obtained through finite element forward modeling. Also, in order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the inversion system, problems such as the efficiency and accuracy of the forward modeling system, absorbing boundary conditions and so on, are stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skeleton-relaxed mechanism is an efficient approach to describe seismic band attenuation, while Carcione's diffusion-relaxed mechanism is not applicable in low frequency and low porosity cases. At present, single-shot-gather-based full wavefield inversion studies mainly aim at shallow layers above several hundred meters depth [24] , and it is very difficult to invert medium parameters in deep layers directly. The main reason comes from the weakness of deep interface reflections, which are easy to be disturbed by noise and can not be recognized for seismic inversion.…”
Section: Full Wavefield Inversion For Actual Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skeleton-relaxed mechanism is an efficient approach to describe seismic band attenuation, while Carcione's diffusion-relaxed mechanism is not applicable in low frequency and low porosity cases. At present, single-shot-gather-based full wavefield inversion studies mainly aim at shallow layers above several hundred meters depth [24] , and it is very difficult to invert medium parameters in deep layers directly. The main reason comes from the weakness of deep interface reflections, which are easy to be disturbed by noise and can not be recognized for seismic inversion.…”
Section: Full Wavefield Inversion For Actual Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following methods to get gradient and Hessian matrix in seismic waveform inversion are almost the same as Pratt's except those computed by perturbation analysis, sensitivity matrix computation or adjoint methods. This can be seen in Zhang's (2003) and Xu and Wang's (2004) papers, which are mainly based on finite element method and sensitivity matrix computation to invert the parameters in structured geological model. In these papers, they also analyzed the anti-noise capacity of the Leverberg-Marquard method (Marfurt, 1984) they used to solve the least-square problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, anisotropic parameters are valuable information for lithology discrimination and characterization of fracture networks. Anisotropic FWI can be applied to reconstruct the velocity and anisotropy parameters more accurately (Zhang et al, 2003;Gholami 2012). However, trade-off effects between different parameters increase the nonlinearity of multi-parameter FWI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%