1975
DOI: 10.1042/cs049008pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reproducibility of the Rebreathing Method for Assessing the Respiratory Response to Inhaled CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reTationslip could be piotted by the computer on an X-Y recorder, thus establishing a permanent record of the parameters (Clarkson, Leitch & McHardy, 1979). Mean values for Sco2and BC02 were derived from three studies on each occasion in each subject in order to minimise differences due to the known variability of CO2 response measurements by the Read technique (Lyall, Bourne & Cameron, 1975).…”
Section: Introduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reTationslip could be piotted by the computer on an X-Y recorder, thus establishing a permanent record of the parameters (Clarkson, Leitch & McHardy, 1979). Mean values for Sco2and BC02 were derived from three studies on each occasion in each subject in order to minimise differences due to the known variability of CO2 response measurements by the Read technique (Lyall, Bourne & Cameron, 1975).…”
Section: Introduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these observations suggest that catecholamines may have a central effect on ventilation but are inconsistent with much animal and human experimental evidence indicating that catecholamines influence ventilation only by mechanisms mediated through the carotid bodies and that these effects are blocked by hyperoxia Cunningham, Hey, Patrick & Lloyd, 1963;Joels & White, 1968;Heistad, Wheeler, Mark, Schmid & Abboud, 1972 X-Y recorder, thus establishing a permanent record of the parameters (Clarkson, Leitch & McHardy, 1979). Mean values for Sco2and BC02 were derived from three studies on each occasion in each subject in order to minimise differences due to the known variability of CO2 response measurements by the Read technique (Lyall, Bourne & Cameron, 1975).…”
Section: Introduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%