2020
DOI: 10.1177/1076217520916769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Report-Research Continuum: A Differentiation Decision-Making Tool for Teachers to Design Rigorous Student Projects

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to assist classroom teachers in discerning qualitative differences between a student-written report and student-led research. There are many connotations to the terms “report” and “research,” and they can have implications on how teachers effectively or ineffectively differentiate instruction to challenge students who have high academic ability. In this article, we present what we coin the Report-Research Continuum (R-RC), which is a differentiation decision-making tool for selec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected studies show that adapting learning content, process, and product might help teachers address students' reading levels and interests. Some examples of content and product differentiation from the studies were by providing diverse books, giving code-focused and meaning-focused instruction based on the students' reading assessments, and allowing students to choose projects in reading instruction [28], [33], [35], [39]. On the other hand, process differentiation can be given by allocating specific instructional time and providing guided reading and individualized instruction in classrooms [36]- [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selected studies show that adapting learning content, process, and product might help teachers address students' reading levels and interests. Some examples of content and product differentiation from the studies were by providing diverse books, giving code-focused and meaning-focused instruction based on the students' reading assessments, and allowing students to choose projects in reading instruction [28], [33], [35], [39]. On the other hand, process differentiation can be given by allocating specific instructional time and providing guided reading and individualized instruction in classrooms [36]- [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, process differentiation was depicted as teachers adapt specific instructional time for reading (SITR) based on student characteristics [36], assigning students to routine comprehension activities developed based on student's interests and targeted reading levels [28], conducting guided reading and targeted reading instruction (TRI) to the students [37], [38], and engaging students with computer-assisted instruction for the independent practice of reading skills such as vocabulary and decoding skills [24], [31]. Finally, product differentiation can be seen from the use of differentiated graphic organizers for students' reading comprehension [28] and choices of projects such as student-written reports or student-led research based on their readiness and interest [39].…”
Section: Content Process and Product Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Action #4: Be Flexible Being flexible within the physical, digital, and affective learning environments is especially beneficial when implementing more advanced differentiation approaches that can be open-ended such as student-led reports and research projects (Gilson & Brigandi, 2020). Flexibility is at the heart of differentiation and can be thought of as synonymous with adaptation to student needs.…”
Section: Action #2: Build An Inclusive Classroom Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%