1999
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.857.10505010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reliability of bone age determination in central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method.

Abstract: This study assessed the reliability of bone age determination in normal central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method and determined the effects of readers' experience on the measured bone ages. Plain hand radiographs of 47 children (aged 2 months to 18.8 years) with normal growth were analysed by four radiologists (two experienced paediatric radiologists and two radiology residents). The readers were blinded to the age of the children. The images were re-read by the same readers 2 months later.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
8
59
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this present study is consistent with those of previous studies by Groell et al, Schmidt et al, and Buken et al, [14][15][16]. In our study SA was delayed and differences were significant for both sexes except for in case of boys who were slightly advanced but the difference was not significant.…”
Section: Skeletal Age Estimationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results of this present study is consistent with those of previous studies by Groell et al, Schmidt et al, and Buken et al, [14][15][16]. In our study SA was delayed and differences were significant for both sexes except for in case of boys who were slightly advanced but the difference was not significant.…”
Section: Skeletal Age Estimationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…19 For a subgroup of children (n ϭ 74), bone age was assessed by an experienced observer with the atlas method of Greulich and Pyle, which was found to be reliable for central European children. 20 For evaluation of the current status of skeletal maturation, we calculated the difference between bone age and chronologic age (bone age delay ϭ bone age minus chronologic age, in years). Routine blood sampling was performed to monitor the therapy.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this method has the advantages of simplicity and availability of multiple ossification centers for the evaluation of maturity, it is, however, qualitative and was compiled solely from Caucasian children who lived in the 1930s. Nevertheless, the Greulich and Pyle standards are, at present, the most commonly used method for skeletal age assessments throughout the world, regardless of ethnic background (3,4).In an attempt to overcome ethnic and racial differences in skeletal maturation, standards have been developed for the German, Scandinavian and Japanese populations (5-9). However, there are still many questions regarding the applicability of the Greulich and Pyle standards to today's American children of different ethnic backgrounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%