1973
DOI: 10.1002/dev.420060510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relevance of memory, arousal, and cue factors to developmental changes in spontaneous alternation by rats

Abstract: Three studies are reported which indicate that memory factors, heightened arousal, and differences in the use of cues are not responsible for the differences in spontaneous alternation (SA) behavior which have been typically found to exist between infant and adult rats. Experiment I examined memory as a factor by reducing intertrial intervals to a minimum. This manipulation did not alter alternation rates at any of the ages studied. Experiment I1 investigated the effect on alternation of reducing the heightene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the initiation of the present studies, Egger (1973) has also confirmed these ontogenetic aspects of alternation. His data are rather unique in that his 15-to 16-day-olds showed reliable perseveration (approximately 25% alternation).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since the initiation of the present studies, Egger (1973) has also confirmed these ontogenetic aspects of alternation. His data are rather unique in that his 15-to 16-day-olds showed reliable perseveration (approximately 25% alternation).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thã ftereffects of a maze-arm choice are known to be degraded with a legnthened IT! (e.g., Egger, 1973). Older Ss, therefore, should exhibit a reduction in alternation with long ITIs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Until about 3 weeks of age, neonatal rats behave in a manner analogous to adults with lesions of the hippocampus, across a wide spectrum of behavioral tasks. Disengagement of the hippocampus in intact juvenile rats may explain why these animals do not alternate at rates similar to adults until they are !25 days old (Kirkby, 1967;Douglas et al, 1973;Egger, 1973) or habituate across repeated exposure to the same environment (Campbell et al, 1969;Feigley et al, 1972;Bronstein et al, 1974), or why they show thigmotaxis in an open field, spending less time investigating objects in the environment (Kurz et al, 1984). Likewise, tasks described as requiring working memory are sensitive to hippocampal disruption in adults (Olton, 1983;Kesner and Rolls, 2001).…”
Section: Late Emerging Behaviors Depend On Proper Hippocampal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%