1977
DOI: 10.1002/dev.420100107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aversive prenatal stimulation: Effects on behavioral, biochemical, and somatic ontogeny in the rat

Abstract: Electric foot shock administered to pregnant rats altered the ontogeny of spontaneous motor activity in their pups. Prenatally stimulated (PMS) offspring were more active than controls on Days 1-10 but less active during the 3rd postpartum week. The age of peak activity, a major developmental landmark, occurred in PMS pups around 10 days of age; in controls maximum activity was not seen until the 3rd week. This effect was independent of the gender of the offspring and the timing of the gestational stimulation.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that the righting reflex of male and female neonates was altered by diet, inasmuch as fish oil retarded and coconut fat accelerated this reflex, and by stress, since PNS pups tended to exhibit longer time to right their bodies than their control counterparts. Some studies report a delayed maturation of the reflex and of the motor development of PNS animals (Meek et al, 2000; Patin et al, 2004), while others have not detected any effect of PNS (Secoli and Teixeira, 1998; Sobrian, 1977). The deleterious effect of stress may depend on the stage of development of the fetus, and would be stronger in the beginning of the ontogenesis of the central nervous system (Patin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results showed that the righting reflex of male and female neonates was altered by diet, inasmuch as fish oil retarded and coconut fat accelerated this reflex, and by stress, since PNS pups tended to exhibit longer time to right their bodies than their control counterparts. Some studies report a delayed maturation of the reflex and of the motor development of PNS animals (Meek et al, 2000; Patin et al, 2004), while others have not detected any effect of PNS (Secoli and Teixeira, 1998; Sobrian, 1977). The deleterious effect of stress may depend on the stage of development of the fetus, and would be stronger in the beginning of the ontogenesis of the central nervous system (Patin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other protocols used various stressors applied daily in repeated sequences (DeFries, Weir, & Hegmann, 1967;Pardon, Gerardin, Joubert, Perez-Diaz, & Cohen-Salmon, 2000). In each of these studies, the animals were subjected to stressors chronically, either during the entire pregnancy (Hockman, 1961;Fride & Weinstock, 1984;Rojo et al, 1985), the first (Suchecki & Palermo-Neto, 1991) or the second half of pregnancy (Herrenkohl & Whitney, 1976;Szuran, Zimmermann, & Welzl, 1994;Williams, Davis, McCrea, Long, & Hennessy, 1999), or at least during several consecutive days (Archer & Blackman, 1971;Fujioka et al, 1999;Sobrian, 1977).…”
Section: Effects Of Prenatal Stress: An Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research involving prenatal manipulation and immune function in the offspring has focused on the effects of environmental toxins, dietary alterations and various pharmaceuticals (Silva et al 1968, Roberts & Chapman 1981, Schmidt 1984. Daily handling, anxiety, electric foot-shocks, restraint with or without bright lights and elevated temperatures, noise, crowding and other stressor stimuli applied to dams can cause these changes in their adult offspring (Ader & Plaut 1968, Fride & Weinstock 1984, 1989, Harvey & Chevins 1985, Sobrian 1988, VonSaal et al 1991, Sobrian et al 1992, Klein & Rager 1995, Silva & Palermo-Neto 1999, Williams et al 1999a. In contrast, power frequency alternating magnetic fields had no effect on reproduction and prenatal development of mice (Yasuyuki et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%