2008
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e31816f27bf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Value of Confocal Microscopy and Superficial Corneal Scrapings in the Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba Keratitis

Abstract: As confocal microscopy comes into wider clinical use, it remains in need of clinical and pathologic correlation. When performed and interpreted by an experienced operator, confocal microscopy is both sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Contemporaneous corneal scrapings are independently sensitive in the detection of Acanthamoeba keratitis, and a combination of both diagnostic modalities offers the highest likelihood of rapidly and accurately diagnosing Acanthamoeba keratitis in p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
91
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An association with reflective round bodies has been found in up to 85% of cases clinically presenting as Acanthamoeba keratitis (Mathers et al, 1996;Parmar et al, 2006). Sensitivities of around 90 to 100% have been described using confocal microscopy compared with much lower sensitivities of 0 to 50% using culture (Mathers et al, 1996;Parmar et al, 2006;Kanavi et al, 2007;Tu et al, 2008;Vaddavalli et al, 2011). Supporting laboratory evidence is still required as it is not possible to state with certainty if the round structures are definitely Acanthamoeba cysts or trophozoites.…”
Section: Pcr Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An association with reflective round bodies has been found in up to 85% of cases clinically presenting as Acanthamoeba keratitis (Mathers et al, 1996;Parmar et al, 2006). Sensitivities of around 90 to 100% have been described using confocal microscopy compared with much lower sensitivities of 0 to 50% using culture (Mathers et al, 1996;Parmar et al, 2006;Kanavi et al, 2007;Tu et al, 2008;Vaddavalli et al, 2011). Supporting laboratory evidence is still required as it is not possible to state with certainty if the round structures are definitely Acanthamoeba cysts or trophozoites.…”
Section: Pcr Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In addition, initiation of anti-acanthamoebal therapy could reduce the sensitivity of culture and smear, as topical therapy might clear superficial infection but not deeper infection. In other words, some repeat cultures were likely false negatives, leading to an underestimate of the median clearance time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this model was performed for the entire patient population (n ¼ 32 eyes), the estimated median clearance time decreased to 38.7 days (95% CI 27.9-53.5 days). When we accounted for the imperfect sensitivity of culture and smear techniques for acanthamoeba diagnosis (assuming 83% sensitivity based on a previous study), 17 the sensitivity of acanthamoeba culture and smear techniques was even lower (eg, sensitivity ¼ 60%), the estimated clearance time increased to 52.7 days (95% CI 38.2-72.7 days). Still lower sensitivities would result in even longer estimations of the duration of infection.…”
Section: Clearance Time Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to directly identify Acanthamoeba trophozoites within the cornea using confocal microscopy and in experienced hands this technique is sensitive and specific 29 . Trophozoites and cysts may be revealed by staining the smear with H&E or Giemsa, while cysts are also readily identified using PAS and fluorescent stains, such as calcofluor white and acridine orange 30 .…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%