2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1274103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relative Information Content of Guidance and Earnings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the other two return windows, the market return association with guidance surprise is more than twice as large as the return association with earnings surprise. Consistent with recent firm‐level evidence (Ball and Shivakumar [], Beyer et al [], Milian []), guidance surprise appears to convey more information to broader equity prices than earnings surprise.…”
Section: Management Forecast Timelinesssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For the other two return windows, the market return association with guidance surprise is more than twice as large as the return association with earnings surprise. Consistent with recent firm‐level evidence (Ball and Shivakumar [], Beyer et al [], Milian []), guidance surprise appears to convey more information to broader equity prices than earnings surprise.…”
Section: Management Forecast Timelinesssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These findings are consistent with the notion that analysts anticipate a certain degree of positive serial correlation in MFEs and adjust their reaction to current management forecasts accordingly. 32 32 Prior studies suggest differential information contents for bundled management forecasts (i.e., forecasts issued with earnings announcements) and stand-alone management forecasts (e.g., Atiase et al [2005], Milian [2010]). We thus reestimate equation (5) across bundled and stand-alone management forecasts, respectively.…”
Section: Management Earnings Forecast Errors?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Prior studies suggest differential information contents for bundled management forecasts (i.e., forecasts issued with earnings announcements) and stand‐alone management forecasts (e.g., Atiase et al [2005], Milian [2010]). We thus reestimate across bundled and stand‐alone management forecasts, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative studies includeBall and Brown (1968), Shivakumar (2008), Foster (1973),Patell (1976),Penman (1980),Ajinkya and Gift (1984),Waymire (1984),Baginski et al (1993),Skinner (1994), Miller (2002,Hutton et al(2003),Milian (2010),Griffin (2003), Li and Ramesh (2009), Lerman and Livnat (2009),Bryan (1997), andBrown and Tucker (2011). 2 Implied volatility is the market's expectation of the average stock return volatility over the duration of the option contract and is equal to the volatility implied by the option's price and an option pricing model such as the Black-Scholes model or the Cox-Ross-Rubinstein binomial tree model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%