2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with high neuroticism were prone to have a sense of inferiority and minded others' ridicule and accusation, often because they were afraid of their opinions or ideas not being recognized by others, leading to new pressure, which reduced the individual's willingness to originality teaching (Boyer and Byrnes, 2009). Teachers with high extroversion were good at socializing, and they were lively and talkative and liked to cooperate with others, so they had a higher creative teaching behavior (Huang et al, 2017). Teachers with high openness traits had rich imagination, hobby diversity, strong curiosity, independent thinking, and no prejudice, so people with high openness will tend to have creative teaching (Rodrigues and Rebelo, 2013).…”
Section: From the Relationship Of Personality Traits To Creative Teacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with high neuroticism were prone to have a sense of inferiority and minded others' ridicule and accusation, often because they were afraid of their opinions or ideas not being recognized by others, leading to new pressure, which reduced the individual's willingness to originality teaching (Boyer and Byrnes, 2009). Teachers with high extroversion were good at socializing, and they were lively and talkative and liked to cooperate with others, so they had a higher creative teaching behavior (Huang et al, 2017). Teachers with high openness traits had rich imagination, hobby diversity, strong curiosity, independent thinking, and no prejudice, so people with high openness will tend to have creative teaching (Rodrigues and Rebelo, 2013).…”
Section: From the Relationship Of Personality Traits To Creative Teacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the mastery of knowledge and science process skills gives positive contribution to scientific creativity, each of 30% and 20%, the rest is determined by other factors. The research that has been done shows that other factors that come from students themselves that influence creativity are creative thinking ability (Amabile, 2012) (Hu et al, 2013) (Poon et al , 2014), motivation (Penga et al, 2013, divergent thinking skills (Huang et al, 2017) and personality (Kinga, Paul & Sefan, 2015). Support for creativity that comes from outside the student's self is the learning environment factor (Richardson & Mishra, 2018) (Gulliksen, 2018), teacher beliefs (Bereczki & Kárpáti, 2018) and cultural factors (Fryer & Bolingbroke, 2011) This study implies that the mastery of knowledge and science process skills is not enough to educate students to be creative but needs other skills.…”
Section: Scientific Imaginationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creative process of science encompasses discovering new scientific problems, deriving hypotheses based on existing knowledge, designing new experiments, evaluating evidence, and verifying theories. This approach allows diverse routes to solutions with novel combinations of knowledge or techniques [11, 12]. Hu and Adey (2002) synthesized the literature about creativity and the nature of science to propose a scientific structure creativity model in which scientific creativity is a combination of the creative process, the characteristics of the creative person, and resulting products [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%