The Relative Effect of Property Type and Country Factors in Reduction of Risk of Internationally Diversified Real Estate Portfolios

Abstract

We examine and test the merits of diversifying portfolios of real estate securities internationally and across property types. Our analysis covers the period January 1990 through July 2005. Using data from the Global Property Research GPR 250 Property Securities Index, which has monthly prices for five property type indexes in 21 countries, we decompose country and property type sources of variation in real estate security returns. We find that property type effects are smaller than country effects. Property type specialization explains only 6% of the variance of national real estate securities index returns. Because property type effects are so small, country diversification is a more effective tool for achieving risk reduction than property type diversification. In addition, we find evidence that the relative importance of country effects is decreasing while that of industry effects is increasing. However, country effects continue to dominate property type effects. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Real estate, Property type categories, Stock market returns,

How Do Institutional Factors Affect International Real Estate Returns?

“…Hoesli and Serrano (2007) examine data from 16 countries over the period of 1990-2004, and conclude that real estate security returns are derived from country betas. Using data from the Global Property Research Index from 1990 to 2002, Glascock and Kelly (2007) argue that, besides country-specific factors, industry composition is important for explaining return variation. Their results are consistent with previous findings that country-specific factors generate returns; but discover that property type specialization also explains return variations.…”

A dynamic model for housing price spillovers with an evidence from the US and the UK markets

“…Hoesli et al (2004) found that real estate is an effective portfolio diversifier and optimal allocation to real estate is 15-25 percent. In their studies, Glascock and Kelly (2007) analyzed real estate investment 71 A dynamic model for housing price spillovers diversification across 21 countries with a data set from January 1990 to July 2005, and found that property type effects are smaller than country effects. Liow and Adair (2009) provided evidence that by using Asian real estate for diversification purposes, the portfolio risk and return profile may improve.…”

Spanish reits as an investment vehicle and financing source of the real state activity

“…En conclusión, los REITs parecen ser un instrumento de inversión inmobiliaria atractivo para la diversificación de carteras y que puede contribuir a la optimización de la frontera eficiente. Así mismo, dado que la correlación entre categorías de inmuebles es mayor que la correlación entre regiones (siempre que se trate de economías diferenciadas), la diversificación geográfica parece ser más efectiva para reducir el riesgo de una cartera (Eichholtz, 1997;Glascock & Lynne, 2007).…”