2021
DOI: 10.1108/tqm-12-2020-0306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships between TQM, TPM, JIT and agile manufacturing: an empirical study in industrial companies

Abstract: PurposeThis empirical study aims to explore the relationship between Total quality management (TQM), Total productive/preventive maintenance (TPM) and Just-in time (JIT). It also seeks to examine the relationship between Just-in time (JIT) and agile manufacturing.Design/methodology/approachData for the study were collected from a survey of 205 industrial companies and the relationships proposed in the framework were tested using structural equation modeling.FindingsThe results indicate that (1) TPM has a posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings endorse the viewpoints of past research studies wherein every DDSC processes aim at creating value proposition for their customers through creating efficient, innovative, less costly and user-friendly products and services (Bag, 2017; Bag et al , 2020a; Gunasekaran et al , 2017; Lycett, 2013; McAfee and Brynjolfsson, 2008; Wamba et al , 2017). Past studies have proposed that an agile supply chain process reduces the gap between customer expectations and actual benefits, offered by the products and services (Khalfallah and Lakhal, 2021). Reviewing the literature and based on an expert's opinion, the researchers intend to reinforce the role of human factor and argue that human factor drives and contributes towards agility in supply chain functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings endorse the viewpoints of past research studies wherein every DDSC processes aim at creating value proposition for their customers through creating efficient, innovative, less costly and user-friendly products and services (Bag, 2017; Bag et al , 2020a; Gunasekaran et al , 2017; Lycett, 2013; McAfee and Brynjolfsson, 2008; Wamba et al , 2017). Past studies have proposed that an agile supply chain process reduces the gap between customer expectations and actual benefits, offered by the products and services (Khalfallah and Lakhal, 2021). Reviewing the literature and based on an expert's opinion, the researchers intend to reinforce the role of human factor and argue that human factor drives and contributes towards agility in supply chain functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCA is one of the most important factors, and it helps SCs to satisfy diverse needs through output based on the dynamic needs of the customer (D. M. Gligor et al, 2015). Therefore, SCA enables SC to respond to consumer needs through development that is focused on its requirements, fast responses to short product life cycles and a volatile market, fast launches of new products to respond to changing customer needs and efficient responses to complex time and quantity delivery requirements (Khalfallah and Lakhal, 2021). In return, it provides CA and increases efficiency in the textile sectors (Chiang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the highly recommended strategies is to adapt the Autonomous Maintenance (AM) techniques. AM technique focus to inculcate the production operators to participate in doing the minor maintenance activities such as periodical cleaning, lubricating, tightening and minor replacement (CLTM) of equipment parts [35].…”
Section: Csf 5: Maintenance Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MM policy must be established and should be incorporated with the existing company's policy. MM should be recognized as one of vital constituent of manufacturing management [35,60]. The top management should really recognize the benefits and outcomes from MM program from business survival and technical perspective.…”
Section: -Key Criteria For Best Practice In Maintenance Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%