The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations

Hansla, André; Gamble, Amelie; Juliusson, Ásgeir; Gärling, Tommy

doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004

Cited by 349 publications

(282 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

243

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The explicit values indicating this U.N. allegation are identified as freedom, equality, solidarity, tolerance, respect for nature, and shared responsibility [41,42]. Pro-environmental behaviors are rooted from a recognition of certain individual values.…”

Section: Sustainability Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the conceptual support in the literature, sustainability values are known to be associated with pro-environmental behavioral intention. The explicit values indicate freedom, equality, solidarity, tolerance, respect for nature, and shared responsibility [41,42]. Pro-environmental behaviors root from an acceptance of certain individual values.…”

Section: Habitmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Determinant Factors of Travelers’ Choices for Pro-Environment Behavioral Intention-Integration Theory of Planned Behavior, Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology 2 and Sustainability Values

Chuang

Chen

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From a previous literature review, there are rare studies that focus on integrating Sustainability Values (SVs), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) to predict potential travelers' behavioral intentions. In light of this, the research is designed to propose a comprehensive understanding of potential travelers' choices for sustainable hospitality businesses by integrating SV, TPB, and UTAUT2 into a theoretical framework, by moderating the effect of age. Prior studies have mentioned TPB identified the role of attitude, perceived behavior control, and moral obligation in generating intention. However, the use of TPB and the extended UTAUT model to explain pro-environmental behavior is lacking. Data was collected from 34 northern, 2 central, and 6 southern Taiwanese consolidated headquarter travel agencies. Email questionnaires were distributed to 630 individuals in 42 travel agencies. The proposed model will be also examining, with an AMOS procedure of structural equation modeling (SEM), the maximum likelihood method of estimation. The results indicated that (1) SVs are positively and significantly impacted by pro-environmental behavioral intention; (2) SVs are positively and significantly impacted by attitude, social influence, perceived behavioral control, and habit respectively; (3) attitude, perceived behavioral control, and habit is positively mediated by the effect between SVs and pro-environmental behavioral intention, respectively; (4) the social demographic variable of age is positively moderated the effect between SVs and social influence.Keywords: sustainability values; theory of planned behavior; unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2; pro-environment behavioral intention

show abstract

Section: Sustainability Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Habitmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Determinant Factors of Travelers’ Choices for Pro-Environment Behavioral Intention-Integration Theory of Planned Behavior, Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology 2 and Sustainability Values

Chuang

Chen

2018

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Throughout the literature, there is a range of evidence in support of the VBN theory's validity as it has been shown to account for variance in many forms of environmentally related behavior (e.g. [26,30,[54][55][56][57]). …”

Section: Values Beliefs and Norms (Vbn) As A Determinant Of Policymentioning

confidence: 99%

Should We Trust in Values? Explaining Public Support for Pro-Environmental Taxes

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In this paper we are concerned with what explains public acceptance and support of environmental taxes. We examine findings in environmental psychology emphasizing that people's (environmental) value-orientation is the dominant driver determining individuals' support for pro-environmental policy instruments. We introduce a complementary model, mainly drawing upon findings in political science, suggesting that people's support for policy instruments is dependent on their level of political trust and their trust in other citizens. More specifically, we analyze whether political trust and interpersonal trust affect individuals' support for an increased carbon dioxide tax in Sweden, while checking their value orientation, self-interest, and various socio-economic values. We make use of survey data obtained from a mail questionnaire sent out to a random sample of 3,000 individuals in 2009. We find that apart from people's values, beliefs, and norms, both political trust and interpersonal trust have significant effects on people's attitudes toward an increased tax on carbon dioxide.

show abstract

“…In some of these studies (Dunlap & McCright 2008, Dunlap & York 2008, Hansla et al 2008Ryan & Spash 2008;Grob 1995) the studied population has been general public while other studies have sampled more specific populations, such as farmers, wildlife managers and biologists (Bjerke & Kaltenborn 1999), car owners (Gärling et al 2003;Nordlund & Garvill 2003), members of transportation associations (Kaiser, Wölfing & Fuhrer 1999), and public and private decision makers (Nilsson, von Borgstede & Biel 2004). It can be also mentioned that several studies (Karp 1996;Kortenkamp & Moore 2001;Milfont & Gouveia 2006;Schultz & Zelezny 1999;Snelgar 2006;Stern, Dietz & Kalof 1993) have used student samples, obviously for convenient and easy access, even if this procedure is not easy to motivate from an adequate sampling perspective.…”

Section: Scales On Environmental Values In Psychology and Socialogymentioning

confidence: 99%

Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility

Heikkurinen

2010

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

134

116

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyzes strategic implications of corporate responsibility (CR) and in particular how a firm can differentiate with an environmentally responsible image. A single case study was conducted in the Nordic hospitality industry with semi‐structured interviews as the main data collection method.By adopting an environmentally responsible identity through shared values with the firm's key stakeholders, the firm can reflect an environmentally responsible image. This image can enhance the firm's strategic position through internal and external differentiators from competitors – as the firm becomes a more preferred employer, partner and supplier, it results in enhanced employee motivation, cost savings, better reputation, and greater guest loyalty. The amount of CR depends on the micro/meso/macro/global‐level drivers, and competitive aims of the firm. The emphasis on stakeholder communication becomes greater as the firm increases its CR‐aggressiveness. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

show abstract

The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations

Cited by 349 publications

References 30 publications

The Determinant Factors of Travelers’ Choices for Pro-Environment Behavioral Intention-Integration Theory of Planned Behavior, Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology 2 and Sustainability Values

The Determinant Factors of Travelers’ Choices for Pro-Environment Behavioral Intention-Integration Theory of Planned Behavior, Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology 2 and Sustainability Values

Should We Trust in Values? Explaining Public Support for Pro-Environmental Taxes

Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About