2000
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationships among objective and subjective environmental stress levels and serum uric acid: The moderating effect of perceived control.

Abstract: This study was designed to investigate the effects of objective and subjective stress levels and perceived control on serum uric acid (SUA). Respondents were 2,504 male and 1,176 female manufacturing employees. Objective job-related stress was assessed by the Ergonomic Stress Level (ESL) inventory (S. Melamed, D. Yekutieli, P. Froom, E. Kristal-Boneh, & J. Ribak, 1999). As expected, ESL was positively associated with SUA, but among male respondents only. The measure of subjective stress, environmental annoyanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference in the odds of all-cause mortality among blue-collar women engaged in high- versus low-strain work (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73–1.29). Finnish Longitudinal Study on Municipal Employees (FLAME) High-Income ( von Bonsdorff et al, 2012 ) Longitudinal Occupational class, occupational position (manager vs. non-manager) All-cause mortality; CVD mortality; Cancer mortality Blue-collar women vs. other women The rates of all-cause mortality among blue-collar women were decreased as compared with white collar women (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.43–1.25), the rates of cardiovascular mortality were decreased among blue-collar women as compared with white-collar women (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.22–2.81) and the rates of cancer mortality were decreased among blue-collar women as compared with white-collar women (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.37–1.56). The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study (JMS) High-Income ( Hirokawa et al, 2013 ) Longitudinal Age; marital status; occupational class; SOC (comprehensibility, manageability, meaningfulness); psychiatric diagnoses (organic disorder, psychotic, dementia, alcohol use disorder) All-cause mortality Blue-collar women vs. other women A The rate of all-cause mortality among blue-collar women was 1.63 times the rate of all-cause mortality among white-collar women (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.06–2.52).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no difference in the odds of all-cause mortality among blue-collar women engaged in high- versus low-strain work (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73–1.29). Finnish Longitudinal Study on Municipal Employees (FLAME) High-Income ( von Bonsdorff et al, 2012 ) Longitudinal Occupational class, occupational position (manager vs. non-manager) All-cause mortality; CVD mortality; Cancer mortality Blue-collar women vs. other women The rates of all-cause mortality among blue-collar women were decreased as compared with white collar women (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.43–1.25), the rates of cardiovascular mortality were decreased among blue-collar women as compared with white-collar women (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.22–2.81) and the rates of cancer mortality were decreased among blue-collar women as compared with white-collar women (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.37–1.56). The Jichi Medical School Cohort Study (JMS) High-Income ( Hirokawa et al, 2013 ) Longitudinal Age; marital status; occupational class; SOC (comprehensibility, manageability, meaningfulness); psychiatric diagnoses (organic disorder, psychotic, dementia, alcohol use disorder) All-cause mortality Blue-collar women vs. other women A The rate of all-cause mortality among blue-collar women was 1.63 times the rate of all-cause mortality among white-collar women (HR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.06–2.52).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social support was an eight‐item measure which covered instrumental and emotional support from significant others at work (peers and superior) based on research by French, Caplan, and Harrison (1982) that has been used in previous studies (e.g. Shirom et al., 2000). Respondents were asked to score, on a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (very true), how much each of the significant others at work was easy to talk to, could be relied on when things got tough at work, and was willing to listen to the respondent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social support was an eight-item measure which covered instrumental and emotional support from significant others at work (peers and superior) based on work by French, Caplan, and Harrison (1982) that has been used in prior work (e.g. Shirom et al, 2000). Respondents were asked to score, on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not true at all) to 5 (very true), how much each of the above significant others at work was easy to talk to, could be relied on when things got tough at work, and was willing to listen to the respondent, as sample items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%