2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-018-9978-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of weight suppression to treatment outcomes during behavioral weight loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, it is well known that there is tremendous individual variation in the amount of weight lost in weight-loss studies. A partial explanation for this variability is that weight-loss outcomes are in part shaped by each participant's level of weight suppression (146) at the outset of a trial. Fourth, a further novel explanation for wide differences in weight-loss outcomes is the degree of weight variability experienced as participants lose weight (152,154).…”
Section: Weight Variability During Weight Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, it is well known that there is tremendous individual variation in the amount of weight lost in weight-loss studies. A partial explanation for this variability is that weight-loss outcomes are in part shaped by each participant's level of weight suppression (146) at the outset of a trial. Fourth, a further novel explanation for wide differences in weight-loss outcomes is the degree of weight variability experienced as participants lose weight (152,154).…”
Section: Weight Variability During Weight Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(When highest past weight is reached before age 21, this discrepancy is better quantified in terms of z ‐BMI; see S. Singh et al, unpublished data, YEAR). Call et al (146) found that individuals high (≥2.04 kg) versus low (<2.04 kg) in weight suppression at the outset of a weight‐loss trial lost significantly less weight 1 year later (7.8 vs. 12 kg). This difference is clinically, not just statistically, significant.…”
Section: Understanding Weight Regain Following Weight Loss: Insights mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight suppression, or the difference between current and highest weight, has demonstrated predictive effects for obesity-related prevention [ 38 ] and evidence of attenuated weight loss in behavioral weight loss interventions [ 39 , 40 ]. These moderating effects are thought to occur because of the psychological impact of deprivation and physiological adaptations related to weight suppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this simple and ready-to-use classification can help reduce the stigma of clinical obesity treatment, improve long-term adherence to obesity therapy, and facilitate the understanding that obesity is a chronic and recurrent disease. The only information that must be reliably obtained is the individual's MWAL, which has previously been proposed as important information in the clinical setting (23,25,111).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this document, the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia -SBEM) and the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (Associação Brasileira de Estudo da Obesidade e Síndrome Metabólica -ABESO) propose a classification for obesity using the maximum weight attained in life (MWAL, or highest-ever weight) and the percentage of weight loss achieved to guide clinical management and individual decisions. This concept could also be useful in clinical trials since individuals with obesity with different weight trajectories can have different outcomes (6,23,24). This proposed classification can also help further disseminate the simple but underappreciated concept of health benefits from clinically achievable weight loss and highlight the importance of obtaining an accurate history of the individual's weight trajectory during evaluation and management of obesity and related disorders (25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%