2016
DOI: 10.7441/soced.2016.04.01.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Social Pedagogy and Social Work

Abstract: Abstract:The article analyses the development of the relationship between social work and social pedagogy at the end of the 20th century in the Czech Republic and compares this relationship to the one in neighbouring countries (Germany, England, France, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Slovakia, Russia, Lithuania). The article further deals with various concepts of this relationship (including identification, differentiation, and convergent principle). It also compares the paradigms of social p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Social pedagogues are expected presences in primary and secondary schools in several countries, including Austria (Heimgartner and Sting, 2013), Belgium (Kornbeck and Radermaecker, 2011), Croatia (Bouillet, 2016), the Czech Republic (Lorenzova, 2018), Denmark (Madsen, 2013), Finland (Hämäläinen, 2019), France (Kern and Reichhart, 2011), Germany (Kreuzer, 2009), Lithuania (Kraus and Hoferkova, 2016), Norway (Borg et al, 2014), Poland (Kantowicz and Wilinska, 2009), Romania (Ezechil, 2015), Russia (Romm, 2016) and Slovakia (Emmerová, 2016). There is growing or rekindled interest in introducing the concept in schools in other countries, such as England (Black et al, 2017), Estonia (Kraav, 2003), Greece (Mylonakou-Keke, 2015a), Ireland (Hämäläinen, 2015), Scotland (Smith and Whyte, 2008), Spain (Úcar, 2011) and Sweden (Eriksson, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social pedagogues are expected presences in primary and secondary schools in several countries, including Austria (Heimgartner and Sting, 2013), Belgium (Kornbeck and Radermaecker, 2011), Croatia (Bouillet, 2016), the Czech Republic (Lorenzova, 2018), Denmark (Madsen, 2013), Finland (Hämäläinen, 2019), France (Kern and Reichhart, 2011), Germany (Kreuzer, 2009), Lithuania (Kraus and Hoferkova, 2016), Norway (Borg et al, 2014), Poland (Kantowicz and Wilinska, 2009), Romania (Ezechil, 2015), Russia (Romm, 2016) and Slovakia (Emmerová, 2016). There is growing or rekindled interest in introducing the concept in schools in other countries, such as England (Black et al, 2017), Estonia (Kraav, 2003), Greece (Mylonakou-Keke, 2015a), Ireland (Hämäläinen, 2015), Scotland (Smith and Whyte, 2008), Spain (Úcar, 2011) and Sweden (Eriksson, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of socially underprivileged or marginalised pupils emerges in most of the analysed texts as the principal mission or objective of social pedagogues in schools (Ezechil, 2015;Giesecke, 1998;Heimgartner and Sting, 2013;Kornbeck, 2014;Kraav, 2003;Kraus and Hoferkova, 2016;Langager and Vonsild, 2007;Lorenzova, 2018;Madsen, 2013;Mylonakou-Keke, 2015b;Romm, 2016;Storø, 2012;Zemancíková, 2010). Here, social pedagogues could then be a natural element of the school's general support system or pupil health team for pupils with special educational needs.…”
Section: Inclusion Through Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies point out that analysing social pedagogy in relation to its professionalization necessarily involves references to social work and the divergence or convergence between the two professions (Hämäläinen, 2013; Janer & Úcar, 2016; Kornbeck, 2014). Recent studies highlight that ‘there are three possible views on the relationship between the two disciplines: 1. in German-speaking countries, there is a unification of both disciplines; 2. typical of English-speaking countries, there is a clear differentiation between the two fields (if social pedagogy is even mentioned); 3. based on integration while maintaining a certain independence of both disciplines (this approach is typical for Slovakia, and in a certain sense, Poland)’ (Kraus & Hoferková, 2016, p. 63). And this does loosely translate into curricular content.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different views have been expressed on the topic: that pedagogy is more theoretical and general and that social work is a more practical and applied science (Mátel and Krejči, 2016); that social work falls under the umbrella of the social sciences while social pedagogy comes under that of pedagogy (Llena, 2018); that social work is more bureaucratic and that the social educator works more closely with people (De Leon, 2014); that social work focuses on solving problematic situations while social pedagogy is more focused on prevention (Kraus and Hoferková, 2016); that social education is oriented towards intellectual development and forming citizens, while social work seeks to improve quality of life through the coordination of social resources (Ponce de León and Castro, 2014); that social pedagogy can be distinguished from social work in that it is not oriented only towards deficits (Hämäläinen, 2003a;Lorenz, 2008); and, lastly and among many other affirmations, that social work adopts a broad perspective towards problem solving, while social pedagogy specifically seeks pedagogical remedies (Stephens, 2009).…”
Section: Social Pedagogy and Social Work: A Complex Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%