The relationship of pain and suffering in a hospice population

Abstract

Although suffering is frequently encountered in the hospice setting, few studies examine this condition. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between terminally ill hospice patients' pain and their physical, spiritual, and personal or family suffering. Using a tool developed to measure suffering in those categories, a convenience sample of 92 patients were asked to rate their worst pain within the last 24 hours, and to rate their suffering at the time of the interview. All items were rated on a 0-10 Numeric Intensity Scale. Pain scores and suffering scores were divided into four categories; no pain or no suffering (0), mild pain or mild suffering (1-3), moderate pain or moderate suffering (4-6), and severe pain or severe suffering (7-10). Mean scores were compared for pain and suffering. More patients experienced suffering than pain. The highest mean suffering scores occurred in the severe pain category. Correlation coefficients for each suffering and pain category were also calculated. Results indicated a statistically significant correlation only between severe pain and suffering in the categories of loss of enjoyment of life, unfinished business, and concern for loved ones. Data indicated that patients view pain and suffering as separate entities. Further research is needed to better define the relationship between pain and suffering in order to improve assessment and intervention in a hospice setting.

Improving Well-Being in Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients. Making the Case for Patient Suffering as a Focus for Intervention Research

“…Suffering because of loss of enjoyment of life and concerns for loved ones was especially severe. There was also little correlation between the physical, psychosocial, or spiritual dimensions, thereby demonstrating that each dimension makes a unique contribution to suffering (23).…”

Dementia Patient Suffering and Caregiver Depression

“…Several recent studies of seriously ill patients suggest that there are measurable universal manifestations of suffering, including (1) physical symptoms such as chronic or acute pain, nausea, and dyspnea; (2) psychologic symptoms of distress, such as depression and anxiety; and (3) indicators of existential/spiritual well-being, which includes measures of inner harmony, meaning and purpose of life, and the extent to which individuals find comfort and strength in religious beliefs. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Suffering is distinct from illness and disability because not all illnesses entail suffering, and individuals vary widely in the extent to which they experience and express their suffering in response to a given health problem. Some patients respond to illness or disability with equanimity and optimism whereas others may respond with fear and hopelessness.…”

Analyse des représentations sociales du cancer et de la souffrance

“…Ces modèles se traduisent par des « injonctions » qui visent à décrire les comportements et modes de pensée (états d'esprit) appropriés auxquels les malades doivent recourir. 2 Notre propos n'est pas de dire que ces situations et mécanismes génèrent systématiquement des situations de souffrance. En effet, les individus développent et mettent en oeuvre des stratégies plus ou moins opérantes pour faire face à des situations stressantes [20].…”

“…La souffrance occupe une place importante dans le projet d'une prise en charge holistique du patient en oncologie [2,38]. Sa manifestation est intrinsèquement liée à l'expé-rience de la maladie cancéreuse -ses atteintes somatiqueset à ses répercussions psychiques.…”