2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11524-016-0071-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Differences and Racial Residential Segregation to Childhood Blood Lead Levels in Metropolitan Detroit

Abstract: This study uses a new approach to assess the impact of different neighborhood characteristics on blood lead levels (BLLs) of black versus white children in metropolitan Detroit. Data were obtained from the Michigan Department of Community Health and the US Bureau of the Census American Community Survey. The Modified Darden-Kamel Composite Socioeconomic Index, bivariate regression, and the index of dissimilarity were used to compute neighborhood BLL unevenness by neighborhood characteristics. Neighborhoods with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Black race remains a strong independent predictor of more blood Pb throughout childhood [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Geospatial analyses have demonstrated that increasing concentrations of exposure to Pb from the air, soil, water, or industrial releases are associated with early childhood BLLs [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], while an increasing percent Black population is a strong predictor for higher blood Pb among young children in US cities, states, and nationwide across the US [32][33][34]39,40,53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. Black children in the US are exposed to more Pb from their environment [47][48][49][50][64][65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Black race remains a strong independent predictor of more blood Pb throughout childhood [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Geospatial analyses have demonstrated that increasing concentrations of exposure to Pb from the air, soil, water, or industrial releases are associated with early childhood BLLs [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], while an increasing percent Black population is a strong predictor for higher blood Pb among young children in US cities, states, and nationwide across the US [32][33][34]39,40,53,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. Black children in the US are exposed to more Pb from their environment [47][48][49][50][64][65][66][67][68][69].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing racial segregation and lower socio-economic status are associated with higher blood Pb among young Black children in the Detroit metropolitan area [40]. Black children present with the highest BLLs during early childhood throughout Marion County, Indiana, where remarkably higher rates of an EBLL ≥10 µg/dL are mostly secluded to the predominantly Black urban core of the City of Indianapolis [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Smith [ 10 ] showed that the DMA’s poor and black neighborhoods were strong predictors for EPA’s Superfund site locations. Lastly, Moody et al [ 11 , 12 ] found that in the DMA, black segregated neighborhoods with lower socioeconomic characteristics were strong predictors of elevated blood lead levels (BLLs) in children residing in those areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential influence is environment toxicants, such as lead exposure, which have known disruptive effects on dopamine (see review by Lidsky & Schneider, ), the primary neuromodulator within brain reward circuitry. Blood lead levels are elevated among children residing in more distressed communities (Moody, Darden, & Pigozzi, ), which may be linked to lead‐based paint exposure in older homes and/or high demolition rates. It is also possible that some of these effects are evident at or before the time of birth, as neighborhood‐level factors predicts greater risk for adverse perinatal outcomes (e.g., preterm birth, small‐for‐gestational age; see meta‐analysis by Vos, Posthumus, Bonsel, Steegers, & Denktas, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%