2011
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship of Language and Emotion: N400 Support for an Embodied View of Language Comprehension

Abstract: According to embodied theories, the symbols used by language are meaningful because they are grounded in perception, action, and emotion. In contrast, according to abstract symbol theories, meaning arises from the syntactic combination of abstract, amodal symbols. If language is grounded in internal bodily states, then one would predict that emotion affects language. Consistent with this, advocates of embodied theories propose a strong link between emotion and language [Havas, D., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
122
5
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
14
122
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, recent studies have reported that predictive processing effects are absent under certain circumstances (e.g., Chwilla, Virgillito, & Vissers, 2011) and in different speaker groups such as children with low vocabulary scores (e.g., Borovsky, Elman, & Fernald, 2012;Mani & Huettig, 2012), older adults (DeLong, Groppe, Urbach, & Federmeier & Kutas, 2005;Federmeier, McLennan, De Ochoa, & Kutas, 2002;Wlotko, Federmeier, & Kutas, 2012), second language learners (e.g., Grüter, Lew-Williams, & Fernald, 2012;Kaan, 2014;Martin et al, 2013), illiterate adults (Mishra, Singh, Pandey, & Huettig, 2012), and patients with schizophrenia (e.g., Ford & Mathalon, 2012;Kuperberg, 2010). While such findings may suggest that certain speaker groups cannot (or do not) engage predictive processing, it is also possible that these speakers do in fact anticipate upcoming inputs during comprehension, but that some of the computations involved are still incomplete when the relevant input arises.…”
Section: Other Cases Of Apparent "Prediction Failure"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recent studies have reported that predictive processing effects are absent under certain circumstances (e.g., Chwilla, Virgillito, & Vissers, 2011) and in different speaker groups such as children with low vocabulary scores (e.g., Borovsky, Elman, & Fernald, 2012;Mani & Huettig, 2012), older adults (DeLong, Groppe, Urbach, & Federmeier & Kutas, 2005;Federmeier, McLennan, De Ochoa, & Kutas, 2002;Wlotko, Federmeier, & Kutas, 2012), second language learners (e.g., Grüter, Lew-Williams, & Fernald, 2012;Kaan, 2014;Martin et al, 2013), illiterate adults (Mishra, Singh, Pandey, & Huettig, 2012), and patients with schizophrenia (e.g., Ford & Mathalon, 2012;Kuperberg, 2010). While such findings may suggest that certain speaker groups cannot (or do not) engage predictive processing, it is also possible that these speakers do in fact anticipate upcoming inputs during comprehension, but that some of the computations involved are still incomplete when the relevant input arises.…”
Section: Other Cases Of Apparent "Prediction Failure"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, embodied theories, in which comprehension entails simulating actions, predict an effect of emotional state on language processing [5] [6]. In line with this, the presence of language by emotional state interactions for N400, have been presented as support for embodied theories (e.g., [15]) over modular (abstract symbol) theories. The absence of a modulation of the processing of the conceptual mismatches in the picture-sentence task reported in this article, therefore, seems to support modular theories of language and challenges embodied theories of language comprehension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…ERP studies at the sentence level have shown that a participant's background emotional state-like being in a happy or sad mood-has an immediate influence on the processing of semantic and syntactic information (e.g., [15] [16]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations