2018
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1427878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wait a second! delayed impact of argument roles on on-line verb prediction

Abstract: Comprehenders can use rich contextual information to anticipate upcoming input on the fly, but recent findings suggest that salient information about argument roles may not impact verb prediction. We took advantage of the word order properties of Mandarin Chinese to examine the time course with which argument role information impacts verb prediction. We isolated the contribution of argument role information by manipulating the order of pre-verbal noun phrase arguments while holding lexical information constant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(173 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…grey), any switch from an original to a revised prediction may have had only minor consequences at the level of the N400. A final possibility is that refining or revising initial predictions may involve computations that require more time than participants had between encountering the discourse marker and reading the critical word (for evidence that contextual facilitation takes time, see Camblin, Ledoux, Boudewyn, Gordon, & Swaab, 2007;Chow, Lau, Wang, & Phillips, 2018;Wlotko & Federmeier, 2015). Future studies could investigate whether discourse markers can modulate N400 predictability effects if more time is available for prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…grey), any switch from an original to a revised prediction may have had only minor consequences at the level of the N400. A final possibility is that refining or revising initial predictions may involve computations that require more time than participants had between encountering the discourse marker and reading the critical word (for evidence that contextual facilitation takes time, see Camblin, Ledoux, Boudewyn, Gordon, & Swaab, 2007;Chow, Lau, Wang, & Phillips, 2018;Wlotko & Federmeier, 2015). Future studies could investigate whether discourse markers can modulate N400 predictability effects if more time is available for prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Role Reversal studies (Chow & Phillips, 2013;Chow, Lau, Wang, & Phillips, 2018;Kim & Osterhout, 2005;Van Herten et al, 2005;Hoeks et al, 2004;Friederici & Frisch, 2000;Kolk et al, 2003). Kuperberg (2007) reviewed this literature and highlighted various factors that may be relevant such as semantic associations, animacy, plausibility, task, and context.…”
Section: Example Sentence Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuperberg (2007) reviewed this literature and highlighted various factors that may be relevant such as semantic associations, animacy, plausibility, task, and context. The work of Chow and colleagues (Chow & Phillips, 2013;Chow et al, 2018) suggested that high predictability and distance between the arguments and the verb were also important. The model's input language was much simpler than human languages and this createed conditions of high predictability that could have enhanced the N400 effect.…”
Section: Example Sentence Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several studies have reported a late frontal positivity in less constraining contexts (e.g. Chow, Lau, Wang & Phillips, 2018;Thornhill & Van Petten, 2012;Zirnstein, van Hell & Kroll, 2018;Freunberger & Roehm, 2016). It is possible that certain inputs provide particularly informative cues that trigger large updates in the mental model, even when there is no need to inhibit wrongly predicted information.…”
Section: Late Frontal Positivitymentioning
confidence: 99%