Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR), a supervisory technique, was examined by a cost/benefit analysis. Cost was defined as the possible inhibitory effects on client self-exploration of the use of IPR; benefit was defined as client satisfaction, increased supervisor ratings, and increased counselor empathy levels. Counselors were master's level trainees, clients were undergraduate psychology students, and supervisors were doctoral students in counseling. The IPR treatment consisted of three videotaped interviews followed by client, counselor, or mutual recall. The comparison treatment consisted of three audiotaped interviews followed by traditional supervision. Results indicated that IPR, when compared to traditional supervision, did not produce differential effects on counselors' empathy level, client satisfaction, supervisor ratings, or clients' self-reported inhibition. Method of supervision, however, did effect significant change in clients' level of self-exploration over time.