“…Historically and etymologically the latter is right. Neverthe'ess, some clinicianand pathologists (Wallace and Whimster, 1951;Waiiace, 1955 ;McAdams and Kistner, 1958) now restrict the diagnosis of leucoplakia to those vulvas which, irrespective of their naked-eye appearances, show on section such a degree of disorderly epithelial activity (" atypism ") as to make it approximate to malignant change (Special Plate, Figs. 3 and 4).…”