2011
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between Workload, Teamwork, Situation Awareness, and Performance in Teams: A microworld study

Abstract: In modern military organizations teamwork performance is central, yet the underlying factors contributing to such performance are debated. The purpose of this paper was to investigate how several known teamwork measures relate to a prior model of operator performance (Nählinder et al, 2004). This study expands this model to the team level and in the command and control domain. Specifically, this paper studies the relationship between individual and team workload measures, situation awareness measures, and perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One example of well-known questionnaires that have been used is the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland, 1988) that calculates workload scores based on several scales, such as mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Another commonly used questionnaire is the Distributed Assessment of Team Mutual Awareness (DATMA), which measures mental workload and teamwork awareness (Berggren et al, 2011). Berggren et al (2011) used both NASA-TLX and DATMA in their study to compare individual and team workload measures.…”
Section: Background Team Performance and Attention Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One example of well-known questionnaires that have been used is the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland, 1988) that calculates workload scores based on several scales, such as mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Another commonly used questionnaire is the Distributed Assessment of Team Mutual Awareness (DATMA), which measures mental workload and teamwork awareness (Berggren et al, 2011). Berggren et al (2011) used both NASA-TLX and DATMA in their study to compare individual and team workload measures.…”
Section: Background Team Performance and Attention Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another commonly used questionnaire is the Distributed Assessment of Team Mutual Awareness (DATMA), which measures mental workload and teamwork awareness (Berggren et al, 2011). Berggren et al (2011) used both NASA-TLX and DATMA in their study to compare individual and team workload measures. Different types of performance measures have also been used for assessment, namely the response time to complete a task and the accuracy of the task performance.…”
Section: Background Team Performance and Attention Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also offer an opportunity for planned data collection on aspects of EMS C2-type work in context as they occur rather than retrospectively. The specific C2-aspects studied in the current work were mental workload and shared workload awareness; two factors that are known from previous research to influence the overall performance of C2-systems (Berggren et al, 2011(Berggren et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure in the EMS C2-system, i.e., failure to efficiently manage emergency resources, can lead to delay of care, with potential negative patient outcome as the end result (Blackwell and Kaufman, 2002). The primary purpose in the current study was therefore to explore two factors known to influence the performance of C2-systems, namely workload and shared awareness (Berggren et al, 2011;Mathieu et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preceptors' strategies for structuring the dynamic and challenging AS context may also be viewed in the light of research indicating that complex educational environments may produce stress and a cognitive overload [184,[187][188][189] thus obstructing the learning intentions and the students' directedness to the intended objectives of learning. This complexity has also been addressed in the context of large-scale collaboration training [190,191] and in research concerning decision-making in complex and dynamic socio-technical systems [192]. The aforementioned research further underlines the findings from this thesis in terms of the importance of adapting the environmental complexity and the students' task load to reduce the risks of obstructing or redirecting the intended objectives of learning, thus affecting the intended learning outcome.…”
Section: Reduced Task Load As Didactic Strategymentioning
confidence: 75%