2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between threshold-based and inflexion-based approaches for extraction of land surface phenology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SOS was identified with the date when the reconstructed NDVI first reaches 9.18% of VGA. This threshold was used because it has been proven to be equivalent to the inflexion point (maximum rate of change in curvature) for extracting SOS at a global scale [34], which is commonly used for phenology retrieval [13][14][15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SOS was identified with the date when the reconstructed NDVI first reaches 9.18% of VGA. This threshold was used because it has been proven to be equivalent to the inflexion point (maximum rate of change in curvature) for extracting SOS at a global scale [34], which is commonly used for phenology retrieval [13][14][15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference NDVI was calculated as the average NDVI on the same day-of-year (DOY) across the complete time series (2000-2016) for each pixel location [34] using MODIS Collection 6 MOD09A1 data. The gaps were created by excluding the NDVI values following the temporal distributions of real clouds in 2006.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approaches For Modeling the Varied Vegmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double logistic model (DL) approach was applied for the gap filling of NDVI time series. With reference to Shang et al [7], the threshold at the inflexion point is 9.18% of vegetation growth amplitude, and thus, a dynamic threshold of 9.18% was used to extract inflexion point of NDVI. Seasonal phenological metrics for start-of-season (SOS) and end-of-season (EOS) were extracted pixel-by-pixel for 2001 through 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial distributions of spring phenology of all vegetation types (including deciduous trees and crops) extracted by seasonal amplitude method (threshold: 0.3) in TIMESAT software from images with different spatial resolutions are shown in Figure 7. Seasonal amplitude method (also known as relative threshold method) to extract vegetation phenology is widely used, and it has been validated by ground truth and another phenological extraction method (e.g., inflexion-based method) [59][60][61]. Moreover, the parameter (0.3) is an empirical threshold that is more suitable for phenology monitoring in the north of China according to the previous studies [23].…”
Section: Urbanization Effects On Vegetation Spring Phenology At Diffementioning
confidence: 99%