2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between the Use of Metacognitive Strategies and Achievement in English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the null-hypothesis is rejected. It is worth mentioning that other studies (e.g., Coskun, 2010;Kummin & Rahman, 2010;Movahed, 2014;Bozorgian, 2014) prove the outcome of the current research in regards to the www.ccsenet.org/elt English Language Teaching Vol. 9, No.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the null-hypothesis is rejected. It is worth mentioning that other studies (e.g., Coskun, 2010;Kummin & Rahman, 2010;Movahed, 2014;Bozorgian, 2014) prove the outcome of the current research in regards to the www.ccsenet.org/elt English Language Teaching Vol. 9, No.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Learners' metacognitive knowledge and cognitive appraisal have also been the chief subject in listening strategy research (Vandergrift, Goh, Mareschal, & Tafaghodtari, 2006). The efficiency of metacognitive strategies awareness on learning has been explored in many research studies (Kummin & Rahman, 2010;Rahimi & Katal, 2012). Some scholars found that more skilled listeners show a higher degree of awareness of their listening problems (Goh, 2000;Zimmerman & Schunk, 2001;Mokhtari & Reichard, 2002;Goh, 2008).…”
Section: Listening Strategies Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zakaria, Yazid and Ahmad (2009) in their study into achievements in mathematics and metacognitive awareness levels of students who were studying for the university entrance exam, reported metacognitive awareness level did not significantly differ by gender. Kummin and Rahman (2010) reported metacognitive strategies did not cause significant difference in terms of the gender variable.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Awareness and use of metacognitive reading strategies have positive and direct relationship with reading comprehension performance; thus, students who use these strategies perform better in reading proficiency tests / courses (Yuksel & Yuksel, 2012;Pressley, et al, 1998;Al-Sobhani, 2013;Tavakoli;Magogwe, 2013;Hong-Nam, 2014;Zhang & Seepho, 2013;Memis & Bozkurt, 2013;Phakiti, 2006;Kummin & Rahman, 2010). Therefore, learning metacognitive reading strategy skills can be one solution to the problem of poor reading comprehension, hence, the need for it to be developed and emphasized in the EFL teaching and learning processes.…”
Section: Metacognitive Reading Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%