2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between the primary teachers’ teaching strategies and their strengths in multiple intelligences (Their multiple intelligence types) (Sampling: Izmir and Lefkosa)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the second question, it was found that except musical intelligence, kinesthetic intelligence as well as visual-spatial intelligence all other five types of intelligences namely natural intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, logical intelligence, verbal intelligence were significantly associated with reflective teaching. These finding are consistent with the findings of previous studies (Ghamrawi, 2014;Mousapour & Khorram, 2015;Serin, Serin, Yavuz & Muhammedzade, 2009;Shatalebi, Sharifi, & Javadi, 2011) who concluded that there is significant relationship between multiple intelligence and language teaching style and classroom practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…With regard to the second question, it was found that except musical intelligence, kinesthetic intelligence as well as visual-spatial intelligence all other five types of intelligences namely natural intelligence, intrapersonal intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, logical intelligence, verbal intelligence were significantly associated with reflective teaching. These finding are consistent with the findings of previous studies (Ghamrawi, 2014;Mousapour & Khorram, 2015;Serin, Serin, Yavuz & Muhammedzade, 2009;Shatalebi, Sharifi, & Javadi, 2011) who concluded that there is significant relationship between multiple intelligence and language teaching style and classroom practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It was found that the teaching style of primary school teachers focused on the naturalistic approach of the environment outside the classroom compared to the teaching style of secondary school teachers which focused on learning's inside the classroom. This finding result is also similar with the findings obtained from the study conducted by Serin et al (2009), stating that primary school teachers who are naturalistically inclined tend to adopt the naturalistic approach in their teaching. In secondary schools, the teaching style of teachers emphasized mainly on interpersonal approach which involves activities like discussion, group work and students interaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to Heikkinen et al (1985), teachers themselves too have a preferred method in perceiving and processing information and it is logical that teachers will communicate and teach their subject matter that is most compatible with their learning style. This can be further supported by the study conducted by Serin et al (2009) which examines the relationship between teaching styles and MI profile of primary school teachers in Izmir and Lefkosa. Based on the findings, variables including the spatial/visual, naturalistic and interpersonal intelligences play a predictive role on the teaching strategies of teachers.…”
Section: Implication Of Theory In Educationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, the study revealed that males do not generally estimate their intelligences higher compared to females. Serin, Serin, Yavuz and Muhammedzade (2009) carried out a comparative study on factors affecting teaching styles and the multiple intelligence types of primary school teachers in Turkey and Cyprus. Simple random sampling was used to sample 140 (57%) female and 105 (42.9%) male primary teachers.…”
Section: Gender Difference In the Types Of Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%