The Relationship Between Teacher Self-Efficacy and the Professional Development Experiences of Agricultural Education Teachers Candidates

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the professional experiences of agricultural education teacher candidates during their internship, their sense of teacher self-efficacy, and their perceptions of their preparation. The population included the entire cohort (n=24) of teacher candidates during the 2007 fall quarter at The Ohio State University. Teacher self-efficacy was measured using the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk Hoy, 2001). Candidates reported high levels of teacher self-efficacy at the end of the experience. The candidates' perception of their level of preparation was similar to their sense of teacher self-efficacy. The largest discrepancy score was for the student engagement domain. Professional development experiences categorized as vicarious experiences revealed the strongest overall relationship with teacher self-efficacy. The experience of observing a first-year agriculture teacher had the strongest positive relationship with overall teacher selfefficacy. This variable explained 11 percent of the variance in overall teacher self-efficacy, and 14 percent of the variance in the instructional strategies domain. Verbal feedback that candidates received from their cooperating teacher was positively related to teacher self-efficacy. The number of courses teacher candidates taught was negatively related to their sense of efficacy in the classroom management domain.

Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs: The Relationship between Gender and Instructional Strategies, Classroom Management and Student Engagement

“…The fact teachers' self-efficacy belief was found to be high indicated that they had a strong belief that adequate knowledge and skills of effective teaching behaviours with respect to instructional strategies, classroom management and student engagement. The finding is supported by the previous studies of Mehdinezhad (2012) and Wolf et al (2010) who for example, in examining the relationships between high school teachers' wellbeing and their efficacy, reported a relatively high score on teachers' efficacy. This also supports the assertion made by Bruce et al (2010) that teachers with higher efficacy levels are more likely to persevere in their attempt to reach learning goals when they encounter obstacles, are more prone to experiencing effective instructional strategies that represent a challenge and are more willing to run risks in their classrooms.…”

Exploring Science Teaching Efficacy of CASE Curriculum Teachers: A Post-Then-Pre Assessment

“…Roberts, Harlin, and Ricketts (2006) investigated teaching efficacy of student teachers during their internship experience and found teachers became more efficacious from the beginning to the end of their teaching experience. Wolf, Foster, and Birkenholz (2010) also explored teaching efficacy of student teachers. They found certain experiences during the student teaching experience resulted in increased levels of teaching efficacy, while others had no effect.…”

The Impact of Time Spent Student Teaching on the Decision to Enter the Field: A Longitudinal Study

“…Physiological and emotional states are the physical and emotional feelings one is experiencing before, during, and after completing a task. Although studies have linked social persuasion and physical/emotional states to self-efficacy beyond Bandura's writings (Clark et al, 2015), the literature is limited regarding their influence on self-efficacy development contributing to the difficulty in measuring the constructs (Wolf et al, 2010).…”