Abstract:This study explores whether, and how, mindfulness mediates the relationship between spiritual leadership and human engineering. Based on data from a sample of 335 members of faculty and administrative staff from Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University in Saudi Arabia, the paper provides insights into how mindfulness affects the relationship between spiritual leadership and human engineering. The authors believe that it is the first time that mindfulness as a mediator in this relationship has been studied. Th… Show more
“…Based on the notion that ecological problems are a function of maladaptive behavior (Maloney & Ward, 1973), solutions relate to the domain of psychology and the tools for changing human behavior (Ones & Dilchert, 2012), especially leadership (Jiang et al., 2019; Mohammed et al., 2022; Qureshi et al., 2021; Stromback, 2021; Wulandari & Zoubir, 2021). As Wilms et al., and Zell (1994) note, employees generally follow their leaders in whatever they ask, in whatever direction they push, and how hard they push, thereby highlighting the importance of trust in leadership (Islam et al., 2020; Islam, Furuoka, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the theory of social learning (Bandura, 1986), subordinates work by observing, imitating, and internalizing the values of leaders to guide their own behaviors and thus achieve the replication of leadership behavior. Accordingly, leadership abilities and styles in guiding and coordinating the potential of all employees are associated with increased work motivation (Afif et al., 2023) and performance (Mohammed et al., 2022), which in turn strengthens their sense of familiarity with and knowledge of their organization, and enhances their feeling of psychological ownership (Jiang et al., 2019). This is defined as “a certain state of mind in which individuals feel targeted ownership or as if a piece of the organization was theirs” (Pierce et al., 2001, p. 299).…”
There has been a growing interest in the organizational and individual factors that affect employees green behaviors. However, it is necessary to examine their interactive effect in order to help clarify the mechanism by which such behaviors are developed and how they could be better reinforced. To address this issue, we have developed and tested a dynamic model of the interactions among responsible leadership, psychological ownership, and green moral identity in predicting employees green behavior. Empirical data were collected from 292 employees working in one of the holding companies, Egypt. The results support the hypothesized model, in which responsible leadership is a significant predictor of employees green behaviors. Moreover, it was found that psychological ownership significantly mediates the relationship between responsible leadership and such behaviors, while green moral identity significantly moderated that relationship. The theoretical and managerial implications of results are discussed. Primarly, organizations should reinforce leaders' sense of commitment toward protecting the environment. In turn, leaders should instil the concept of environmentalism as a continuous way of life in workplace culture.
“…Based on the notion that ecological problems are a function of maladaptive behavior (Maloney & Ward, 1973), solutions relate to the domain of psychology and the tools for changing human behavior (Ones & Dilchert, 2012), especially leadership (Jiang et al., 2019; Mohammed et al., 2022; Qureshi et al., 2021; Stromback, 2021; Wulandari & Zoubir, 2021). As Wilms et al., and Zell (1994) note, employees generally follow their leaders in whatever they ask, in whatever direction they push, and how hard they push, thereby highlighting the importance of trust in leadership (Islam et al., 2020; Islam, Furuoka, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the theory of social learning (Bandura, 1986), subordinates work by observing, imitating, and internalizing the values of leaders to guide their own behaviors and thus achieve the replication of leadership behavior. Accordingly, leadership abilities and styles in guiding and coordinating the potential of all employees are associated with increased work motivation (Afif et al., 2023) and performance (Mohammed et al., 2022), which in turn strengthens their sense of familiarity with and knowledge of their organization, and enhances their feeling of psychological ownership (Jiang et al., 2019). This is defined as “a certain state of mind in which individuals feel targeted ownership or as if a piece of the organization was theirs” (Pierce et al., 2001, p. 299).…”
There has been a growing interest in the organizational and individual factors that affect employees green behaviors. However, it is necessary to examine their interactive effect in order to help clarify the mechanism by which such behaviors are developed and how they could be better reinforced. To address this issue, we have developed and tested a dynamic model of the interactions among responsible leadership, psychological ownership, and green moral identity in predicting employees green behavior. Empirical data were collected from 292 employees working in one of the holding companies, Egypt. The results support the hypothesized model, in which responsible leadership is a significant predictor of employees green behaviors. Moreover, it was found that psychological ownership significantly mediates the relationship between responsible leadership and such behaviors, while green moral identity significantly moderated that relationship. The theoretical and managerial implications of results are discussed. Primarly, organizations should reinforce leaders' sense of commitment toward protecting the environment. In turn, leaders should instil the concept of environmentalism as a continuous way of life in workplace culture.
“…In particular, Mohammed et al. (2022) emphasized the mediating role of mindfulness in enabling leadership dimensions to positively influence work outcomes, whereas Rahman et al. (2022) highlighted that cyberloafing (e.g., browsing on social media and websites) has no direct effect on employee performance and that innovative work behavior could play a mediating role in enhancing the relationship between cyberloafing and employee performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To contribute potential solutions, two purposefully selected studies were included in the present issue to accompany Sutarto et al (2022). In particular, Mohammed et al (2022) emphasized the mediating role of mindfulness in enabling leadership dimensions to positively influence work outcomes, whereas Rahman et al (2022) highlighted that cyberloafing (e.g., browsing on social media and websites) has no direct effect on employee performance and that innovative work behavior could play a mediating role in enhancing the relationship between cyberloafing and employee performance. These studies show that employers do not need to worry about cyberloafing, provided that this is not a compulsive behavior, and that the focus should be on cultivating mindfulness among organizational leaders and innovative work behavior among employees in order to safeguard and strengthen work performance in the new normal.…”
“…However, it could shed light on the idiosyncratic process through which employees assign meaning to their green actions and experiences. Prior literature has revealed the role of intrinsic motivation and psychological capital (Li et al, 2022); employee voice behavior (Zakkariya & Aboobaker,2020); and mindfulness (Mohammed et al,2022) as the characteristics that serve as the mediators between spiritual leadership and work-related behavioral outcomes. Afsar et al (2016) asserted that "Spiritual leaders emphasize ethical and ecological ideals and advocate their transcendental significance", which has a favorable impact on the results of their work-related outcomes.…”
Purpose: The current paper investigates the role of spiritual leadership in increasing employees’ voluntary eco-friendly behavior. This research emphasizes the value of a harmonious green passion (HGP) and connectedness to nature (CTN) as a mediating factor between a spiritual leader (SL) and an employee’s voluntary eco-friendly behavior (VEB).
Design/Methodology: The data was provided by a sample of 273 participants who worked as hotel employees in Yogyakarta’s four and five-star hotels. SPSS and AMOS 25 were used as statistical programs to analyze the data.
Findings: Based on the discovery, the study presents strong theoretical and managerial implications that hospitality institutions can use to evaluate the importance of spiritual leaders on employees’ eco-friendly behavior among employees. We also discovered that indirect associations between spiritual leadership and employee voluntary eco-friendly behavior exist via connectedness to nature and harmonious green passion.
Practical Implication: By shedding further light on how and when a spiritual leader influences employees’ voluntary eco-friendly behavioral intention in hotels, this research added to the body of knowledge on the hospitality industry in South East Asia.
Originality: The study offers novelty by emphasizing the function of connectedness to nature and harmonious green passion in the relationship between spiritual leadership and employees’ eco-friendly behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.