2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-003-0617-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between social networks and occupational and self-care functioning in people with psychosis

Abstract: There is a strong relationship between social networks and functioning after taking account of course of illness. That is, the presence of family and friends is generally associated with better self-care and employment. Interventions that are targeted at improving social relationships are likely to have a positive impact on self-care and occupational functioning (and vice versa).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Friends may also help them to preserve self-identity and their sense of worth in challenging circumstances [ 1 ]. Patients with psychosis with friends-dominated or friends-inclusive social networks were found to have less difficulties in self-care than those with family-dominated networks [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Friends may also help them to preserve self-identity and their sense of worth in challenging circumstances [ 1 ]. Patients with psychosis with friends-dominated or friends-inclusive social networks were found to have less difficulties in self-care than those with family-dominated networks [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social networks play an important role in patients with psychosis as they can mobilise resources, provide information, and help patients manage their illness [ 4 ]. The characteristics of patients’ networks influence their well-being, social functioning and use of mental health services [ 4 6 ]. Individuals with psychosis frequently experience difficulties in developing and maintaining social relationships [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of high prevalence of unemployment, previous studies have aimed at investigating factors that predict poor vocational status in this group of patients. Inconsistent results indicate that such demographic variables as gender ( Beiser et al, 1994 ; Harrison, Croudace, Mason, Glazebrook, & Medley, 1996 ; McCreadie, 1982 ; Ran et al, 2011 ; Ucok et al, 2012 ), educational attainment ( Cougnard, Goumilloux, Monello, & Verdoux, 2009 ), previous work history ( Mueser, Salyers, & Mueser, 2001 ; Schennach-Wolff, Musil, Moller, & Riedel, 2012 ), marital status ( Evert, Harvey, Trauer, & Herrman, 2003 ; Loganathan & Murthy, 2011 ; Midin et al, 2011 ; Srinivasan & Thara, 1997 ) and rural or urban environment ( Munk-Jorgensen & Mortensen, 1992 ; Yang et al, 2013 ) are associated with vocational outcome. In turn, the following clinical factors have been found to increase unemployment rates: severity of negative symptoms ( Erickson, Jaafari, & Lysaker, 2011 ; Marwaha et al, 2009 ; Schennach-Wolff et al, 2009 ), impaired insight ( Erickson et al, 2011 ), cognitive dysfunction ( Tsang, Leung, Chung, Bell, & Cheung, 2010 ), duration of untreated psychosis ( Chang et al, 2012 ) and older age of schizophrenia onset ( Ran et al, 2011 ), comorbid metabolic syndrome ( Medeiros-Ferreira, Obiols, Navarro-Pastor, & Zuniga-Lagares, 2013 ) and the number ( Lay, Blanz, Hartmann, & Schmidt, 2000 ) and duration ( Nordt, Muller, Rossler, & Lauber, 2007 ) of hospitalizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the first therapeutical contact after onset was not earlier or later than in other cases and also their living situation did not differ from the total group of evaluated patients [ 19 ]. Comparing the situation of employment [ 20 ] and primary income, however, the differences were significant and they imply that the group of LSH-patients were living under worse conditions than other patients even at the time of the first contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%