The relationship between patriotism and regional identification: a cross-country analysis

Abstract

Patriotism—as an ambivalent attitude towards the nation—has less exclusionary characteristics than nationalism and regional identification, because it does not require comparisons and hierarchies. What is less clear, however, is how to explain the positive evaluation of patriotism in the wider population. The article analyses the positive relationship of patriotism with nationalism and regional identification in 29 national and 421 regional contexts. The paper clearly shows that different factors explain the positive evaluation of patriotism and the mind-set of patriotism itself. While a nationalist attitude and regional identification at the individual level are strongly associated with a positive evaluation of patriotism and patriotism itself, institutionalised forms of regional autonomy are shown to be insignificant for the evaluation of patriotism and ambivalent for patriotism itself at the context level. The article concludes by discussing these results in the context of a Janus-faced nature of regional identification that can contribute to an inclusive society as much as to a nationalist-chauvinist attitude and which has so far been overlooked in regional science.

Reflecting on a dynamic biennium: The Annals of Regional Science 2022–2023

“…Baycan and Öner (2023) offer a thought-provoking take on social capital's role in regional development. Dirksmeier's (2023) analysis differentiates patriotism from nationalism and examines its relation to regional identity. Fan et al's (2023) work elucidates the complex ties between economic growth, urbanization, and public health.…”

The Effect of National Insight and Religious Moderation on Radical Behavior of Secondary School Students

“…However, the characteristics of the nationalist attitude proposed by Green et al [38] include willingness to sacrifice, love for the homeland, desire to uphold national values, pride in being a native citizen, obedience to rules, and discipline. A positive nationalist attitude can foster harmony within a nation, but excessive nationalism can be a means to create divisions between different countries [40]. Because the Indonesian state is a state based on nationalism and not a state Education Research International based on religious beliefs, radical understanding that aims to make Indonesia a state based on religion is contrary to Pancasila as the basis of the Indonesian state [39].…”