2010
DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2010.490575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between patient satisfaction with physical therapy care and global rating of change reported by patients receiving worker's compensation

Abstract: This study examined relationships between patient satisfaction with physical therapy care and global rating of change; 1,944 respondents completed the Medrisk Instrument for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Physical Therapy Care (MR-12) and a nine-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC) following a course of physical therapy for a work-related musculoskeletal problem. Ninety percent of all respondents reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their overall care, whereas 70.1% of all respondents ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Responses to satisfaction surveys are difficult to interpret because they usually refer to a complex function of expectations that may vary greatly among patients despite comparable care [4]. However the use of feedback provided by patient satisfaction surveys helps to incorporate patient views into clinical practice and may lead to improved outcomes following treatment [5,6]. Over the years, several questionnaires have been developed to evaluate concepts such as patient satisfaction or experience [7-10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses to satisfaction surveys are difficult to interpret because they usually refer to a complex function of expectations that may vary greatly among patients despite comparable care [4]. However the use of feedback provided by patient satisfaction surveys helps to incorporate patient views into clinical practice and may lead to improved outcomes following treatment [5,6]. Over the years, several questionnaires have been developed to evaluate concepts such as patient satisfaction or experience [7-10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Hush et al on the comparison of satisfaction of musculoskeletal patients at an international level, the correlation between satisfaction and GRC was low (r = -0.22) (29). In a study by Beattie et al a significant negative correlation was found between GRC and patient satisfaction, and the correlation with Med Risk's factors was also poor to moderate (-0.18 to -0.30) (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The VAS is based on a 10-cm line that the patient reports pain in a range of 0 to 10 [27]. The GRC measures the change in the patient's status after the treatment [38]. We chose the GRC because it has a wide range of response choices that would allow a precise estimate of the change in health status that is independent of satisfaction with care [39].…”
Section: Divergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%