2020
DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between measures of spinal deformity and measures of thoracic trunk rotation

Abstract: Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. • Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D plots (Figures 2–4) show that there is an association between the location of the most prominent points and the shape of the spine, in that a diagnosis of AIS or SK changes the location in comparison to those without abnormal surface topography, but this link is not clear. In AIS, characterised by relative hypokyphosis, scoliosis and vertebral body rotation, previous studies using cross sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and measures of spinal or torso deformity have not shown a strong association (Lotfi et al, 2020; Thulbourne & Gillespie, 1976). Similar work in SK is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 3D plots (Figures 2–4) show that there is an association between the location of the most prominent points and the shape of the spine, in that a diagnosis of AIS or SK changes the location in comparison to those without abnormal surface topography, but this link is not clear. In AIS, characterised by relative hypokyphosis, scoliosis and vertebral body rotation, previous studies using cross sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and measures of spinal or torso deformity have not shown a strong association (Lotfi et al, 2020; Thulbourne & Gillespie, 1976). Similar work in SK is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only a standard, radiographic assessment was utilized. Meanwhile, we must bear in mind that radiographs do not provide direct information about individuals’ body shapes with AIS [ 35 ]. Since rib hump magnitude is not well correlated to radiological features, this would explain the poor correlation between cosmetic and radiological features, as indicated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using 3D ST have often been used to find a measurement method that produces results parallel to the Cobb angle measured by conventional radiography [37,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Typically, the results of this approach are less than moderately accurate due to the different measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of 3D ST also allows analysis of scoliotic deformity, chest deformities including funnel chest, posture, the kyphotic angle of the spine, and back shape, and the detection of stimulated back muscle contractions. Automatic localization of anatomical landmarks on the dorsal surface was proposed by Drerup and Hierholzer in 1987 [39] using calculations from rasterstereographic surface measurements and was continued by other researchers [34,42,45,[69][70][71]. The surface curvature drawn from the image is related to the previously described anatomical osteologic prominencies [31,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%