The relationship between masticatory and swallowing behaviors and body weight

Isabel, Carlos Alberto Camargo; Moysés, Marcos Ribeiro; Bilt, Andries van der; Gameiro, Gustavo Hauber; Ribeiro, José Carlos Rabelo; Pereira, Luciano José

doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.006

Cited by 42 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, masticatory performance did not differ significantly between groups, but differed by gender . However, in a recent study of our group, obese individuals had the largest median particle sizes (both after 20 chewing cycles and at the moment of swallowing), when compared to overweight, normal weight and underweight matched controls . These results indicated that obese subjects had less good masticatory performance.…”

Section: Food Choice and Nutritional Intakecontrasting

confidence: 47%

“…Our findings did not support the existence of an ‘obese eating style’, as the chewing rate and number of chews until swallowing did not differ between groups. However, we observed an alteration in masticatory pattern in the obese group, which was linked to a decreased number of teeth and occlusal units . Consensus exists in literature about males presenting larger bite size, larger chewing power and higher chewing frequency as compared to females.…”

Section: Food Choice and Nutritional Intakementioning

confidence: 51%

“…Consensus exists in literature about males presenting larger bite size, larger chewing power and higher chewing frequency as compared to females. Females chew more times and spend more time eating meals than males (141,142).…”

Section: Body Weight and Food Preferencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The influence of oral processing, food perception and social aspects on food consumption: a review

Pereira

Bilt

2016

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eating is an essential activity to get energy and necessary nutrients for living. While chewing, the food is broken down by the teeth and dissolved by saliva. Taste, flavour and texture are perceived during chewing and will contribute to the appreciation of the food. The senses of taste and smell play an important role in selecting nutritive food instead of toxic substances. Also visual information of a food product is essential in the choice and the acceptance of food products, whereas auditory information obtained during the chewing of crispy products will provide information on whether a product is fresh or stale. Food perception does not just depend on one individual sense, but appears to be the result from multisensory integration of unimodal signals. Large differences in oral physiology parameters exist among individuals, which may lead to differences in food perception. Knowledge of the interplay between mastication and sensory experience for groups of individuals is important for the food industry to control quality and acceptability of their products. Environment factors during eating, like TV watching or electronic media use, may also play a role in food perception and the amount of food ingested. Distraction during eating a meal may lead to disregard about satiety and fullness feelings and thus to an increased risk of obesity. Genetic and social/cultural aspects seem to play an important role in taste sensitivity and food preference. Males generally show larger bite size, larger chewing power and a faster chewing rhythm than females. The size of swallowed particles seems to be larger for obese individuals, although there is no evidence until now of an 'obese chewing style'. Elderly people tend to have fewer teeth and consequently a less good masticatory performance, which may lead to lower intakes of raw food and dietary fibre. The influence of impaired mastication on food selection is still controversial, but it is likely that it may at least cause adaptation in food choice. Systemic conditions, such as high blood pressure, diabetes and cancer, with or without medicine use, tend to be associated with taste and chewing alterations. However, definite conclusions seem hard to reach, as research protocols vary largely.

show abstract

Section: Food Choice and Nutritional Intakecontrasting

confidence: 47%

Section: Food Choice and Nutritional Intakementioning

confidence: 51%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of oral processing, food perception and social aspects on food consumption: a review

Pereira

Bilt

2016

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Risk and protective factors (multivariable logistic regression) independently associated with "bad" or "very bad" self-rated perception impacts of GH or OH, for nDM2 and DM2 participants. 39,40 the DM2 group had significantly more participants in the heavier classes of BMI than the nDM2 group. However, no relation was found between MT and obesity, as described by Nascimento.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Self-rated health and oral health in type 2 diabetic patients – a case-control study

Frias-Bulhosa¹,

Manso²,

Mota³

et al. 2018

j.rpemd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. a b s t r a c t Objectives: To analyze whether there are differences between self-rated general health (SRH) and self-rated oral health (SROH) between individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and without DM2, and to explore the general and oral conditions associated with major impacts on general health (GH) and oral health (OH) self-perception.Methods: After obtaining ethical approval and informed consent, the sample included 343 DM2 patients (DM2 group) and 323 controls (nDM2 group), all adult volunteers. Data was obtained from clinical records and oral health examination, using WHO criteria and a questionnaire to rate their own GH and OH on a Likert 5-point scale. Inference analysis was conducted using parametric and non-parametric tests and logistic multivariable regression (MLR) (α=0.05).Results: DM2 patients' perception of own GH was significantly worse than nDM2's (p<0.001).The MLR showed that the risk factors for a worse perceived GH were calculus and oral hygiene at night in nDM2, and HTA, dyslipidaemia and at least one missing tooth in DM2. Both SRH and SROH were significantly (p<0.001) often classified as "bad" or "very bad" in DM2.Calculus and pockets ≥4mm were identified as increased risk factors (OR=3.55, p=0.049;OR=4.32, p=0.025, respectively) and DMFT>0, calculus and gingival recession were associated (p<0.001) with "bad" or "very bad" SRH and SROH in the MLR.Conclusions: Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus showed a worse self-perception of own general health and oral health than individuals without this pathology, and oral health was generally self-rated worse than general health. (Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2018;59(4):181-190) © 2018 Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária. Publicado por SPEMD. Este é um artigo Open Access sob uma licença CC BY -NC -ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by -nc -nd/4.0/). Keywords: Case-control study Primary health care Self-rated health Self-rated oral health Type 2 diabetes r e s u m o Auto-avaliação de saúde e saúde oral em pacientes diabéticos tipo 2 -estudo caso-controle Palavras-chave: Estudo caso-controlo Cuidados de saúde primários Autoavaliação da saúde Autoavaliação da saúde oral Diabetes tipo 2Objetivos: Verificar existência de diferenças entre a autoavaliação da saúde geral (SRS) e da saúde oral (SROH) entre pacientes com diabetes melittus tipo 2 (DM2) e sem (nDM2) e explorar as condições de maior impacto na saúde geral (GH) e oral (OH) associadas à autoperceção.Métodos: Após aprovação ética e consentimento informado, obteve-se 343 adultos DM2 e 323 controlos. Os dados clínicos e de OH foram coletados usando critérios da OMS e perguntas para autoclassificação de GH e OH numa escala de Likert (5 pontos). A análise inferencial utilizou testes não-paramétricos e regressão logística multivariada (MLR) (α=0,05).Resultados: Os pacientes DM2 autoavaliam ...

show abstract

“…Así que tan solo masticar podría sugerirse que se añade como una solución para algunos problemas digestivos. Y esto sin tomar en cuenta los estudios sobre las relaciones entre, la masticación y el estrés (Gomez et al, 2010;Hori et al, 2005;Koizumi et al, 2011), la pobre masticación y la obesidad (Shiozawa, 2015;Isabel et al, 2015;Zhu & Hollis, 2015) la masticación y la atención y el rendimiento (Hodoba, 1999;Kutoba et al, 2003;Hasegawa et al, 2007;Kawanishi et al, 2010;Hirano et al, 2012;Ono et al, 2010).…”

Section: Contact Infounclassified

MASTICAR: Cómo la evidencia muestra que la Fuerza Motriz Contribuye en el Desarrollo Facial

Paskay¹

2015

RCSF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The relationship between masticatory and swallowing behaviors and body weight

Cited by 42 publications

References 43 publications

The influence of oral processing, food perception and social aspects on food consumption: a review

The influence of oral processing, food perception and social aspects on food consumption: a review

Self-rated health and oral health in type 2 diabetic patients – a case-control study

MASTICAR: Cómo la evidencia muestra que la Fuerza Motriz Contribuye en el Desarrollo Facial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About