The relationship between masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and facial profile in young Korean adults

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between masseter muscle thickness, facial morphology, and mandibular morphology in Korean adults using ultrasonography.Materials and MethodsUltrasonography was used to measure the masseter muscle thickness bilaterally of 40 adults (20 males, 20 females) and was performed in the relaxed and contracted states. Facial photos and panoramic radiography were used for morphological analyses and evaluated for correlations with masseter muscle thickness. We also evaluated the correlations of age, body weight, stature, and body constitution with masseter muscle thickness.ResultsIn the relaxing, the masseter was 9.8±1.3 mm in females and 11.3±1.2 mm in males. In the contracted state, it was 12.4±1.4 mm in females and 14.7±1.4 mm in males. Facial photography showed that bizygomatic facial width over facial height was correlated with masseter muscle thickness in both sexes in the relaxed state, and was statistically significantly correlated with masseter muscle thickness in males in the contracted state. In panoramic radiography, correlations were found between anterior angle length and posterior angle length and masseter muscle thickness in females, and between body length and posterior angle length, between anterior angle length and body length, between ramal length and body length, and between body length and condyle length in males.ConclusionMasseter muscle thickness was associated with facial and mandibular morphology in both sexes, and with age in males. Ultrasonography can be used effectively to measure masseter muscle thickness.

Ultrasound measurements of superficial and deep masticatory muscles in various postures: reliability and influencers

“…To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first study exploring the reliability of US measurements for the lateral pterygoid muscle. During the literature search, only a few articles had investigated the influence of age, gender, height and weight on superficial masticatory muscles 18,19 . In the present research, the multivariate analysis also revealed that age and BMI were likely to be associated with an increase in masticatory muscle thickness, whereas the thickness tended to be lesser in females.…”

“…Although several studies 16 , 17 have assessed masticatory muscle thickness using US, only a few of them considered the influence of potential confounders, such as laterality, oral posture, age, gender, weight and height 18 , 19 . Additionally, previous research focused only on the superficial masticatory muscles but not the deep ones, which would be equally important for the oral motor function.…”

Application of ultrasound for muscle assessment in sarcopenia: 2020 SARCUS update

“…Masseter muscle was evaluated at its most prominent area at the same angle as the occlusal plane, for muscle thickness [84]; with the probe placed perpendicular to the anterior margin of the masseter muscle and external surface of the mandibular ramus, between 2 and 2.5 cm above the lower mandibular margin, in a supine position with the molars of both arches touching without pressure (light occlusal contact position), for muscle thickness [85]; by palpation to aid in placing the transducer perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fibers, approximately 2 cm above the mandible branch, for muscle thickness [86].…”

MRI-Based Assessment of Masticatory Muscle Changes in TMD Patients after Whiplash Injury

“…Thus, masseter and temporalis muscles play a more crucial role in mastication, which can lead to fatigue build-up and become vulnerable to tenderness [ 52 ]. In addition, the average thickness values of the masseter muscle (13.65 ± 2.19 mm), temporalis muscle (6.66 ± 1.14 mm), MPM (14.73 ± 1.32 mm), and LPM (15.59 ± 1.40 mm) were different [ 53 , 54 , 55 ]. Specialization in fiber type composition and fiber cross-sectional area can be reflected in these intramuscular differences.…”