2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0483(00)00033-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between JIT practices and type of production system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
1
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
98
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Assim, foi necessário selecionar aqueles estudos cujos resultados fossem consistentes com a definição de risco proposta pelo PMI (Project Management Institute, 2004), já apresentada na seção 1. Por exemplo, a influência do tipo de processo (White & Prybutok, 2001) ou idade da planta (Shah & Ward, 2003) não foram considerados riscos, pois não constituíam em si incertezas. Essas são características inerentes à planta ou setor produtivo.…”
Section: Delineamento Da Pesquisaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assim, foi necessário selecionar aqueles estudos cujos resultados fossem consistentes com a definição de risco proposta pelo PMI (Project Management Institute, 2004), já apresentada na seção 1. Por exemplo, a influência do tipo de processo (White & Prybutok, 2001) ou idade da planta (Shah & Ward, 2003) não foram considerados riscos, pois não constituíam em si incertezas. Essas são características inerentes à planta ou setor produtivo.…”
Section: Delineamento Da Pesquisaunclassified
“…Tais fatores têm sido discutidos em pesquisas com diferentes orientações metodológicas, como estudos de caso (Lima & Zawislak, 2003;Achanga et al, 2006;Scherrer-Rathje et al, 2009;Piercy & Rich, 2009) e surveys (Cua et al, 2001;White & Prybutok, 2001;Shah & Ward, 2003;Bayo-Moriones et al, 2008;Sim & Rogers, 2008;Freitas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…These effects are greater if large groups of practices are implanted, and not in an isolated way, taking advantage of a synergetic effect between them (White & Prybutok, 2001). Thanks to lean manufacturing companies can improve their productivity as much in terms of workforce as machinery, and can reduce time between receipt of order and completion of production, can improve internal and external quality and reduce inventory levels and unit costs (Callen et al, 2000;White & Prybutok, 2001;). All of this allows an improvement in competition.…”
Section: Customer Relationship (Cr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have concluded that Lean Production (LP) is a multifaceted construct composed by several bundles of practices (Cua et al, 2001;White and Prybutok, 2001;Shah and Ward, 2003;Bonavia and Marin, 2006): flow production (uniform workload, pull systems, cellular manufacturing, quick changeover techniques...), quality management (quality assurance, statistical process control, continuous improvement, standard operation procedures...), and productive maintenance (preventive maintenance, autonomous maintenance, maintenance optimization...).…”
Section: Lean Production and Human Resource Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%