2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between flexibility and EMG activity pattern of the erector spinae muscles during trunk flexion–extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deep flexion was held for 4 s followed by 3e5 s extension to upright posture, and then static standing through the end of recording. Finally one of the trials was chosen depending on signal quality for data analysis (Hashemirad et al, 2009).…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep flexion was held for 4 s followed by 3e5 s extension to upright posture, and then static standing through the end of recording. Finally one of the trials was chosen depending on signal quality for data analysis (Hashemirad et al, 2009).…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown that individuals with higher flexibility are able to turn off the muscles under tension during a stretch. For instance, Hashemirad et al (2009) reported that individuals with higher scores in a touch-toe flexibility test were able to relax their erector spinae muscles while in large trunk flexion angles, while those with lower scores did not. It is probable that increased flexibility in our experienced group was a noteworthy contributor to their ability to remain in trunk flexion for longer, by allowing them to relax their back during tying.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A threshold level, 5% of the peak value of MAV of ES, obtained during all of the trials for both conditions was used to initially determine the beginning and the ending of the myoelectric activity (Olson et al, 2006;Hashemirad et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%