Abstract:Theoretical studies propose an association between family violence and low self-control in adolescence; however, empirical findings of this association are inconclusive. The aim of the present research was to systematically summarize available findings on the relation between family violence and self-control across adolescence. We included 28 studies with 143 effect sizes, representing more than 25,000 participants of eight countries from early to late adolescence. Applying a three-level meta-analysis, taking … Show more
“…Such imbalances in the development of self-control underline the need to examine the role of different types of self-control in the “school discipline–self-control” association. Therefore, in this study, we not only operationalize self-control as general self-control, as many other meta-analyses about self-control did (De Ridder et al, 2012; Li et al, 2019; Willems et al, 2019; Willems, Li, et al, 2018), but we also differentiate between different types of self-control and examine whether the type of self-control moderates the association between school discipline and self-control.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of School Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although self-control has biological underpinnings, existing studies have also suggested that self-control can be substantially shaped by the environment (Willems, Dolan, et al, 2018; Willems et al, 2019). Many studies have considered family as the primary context that nurtures child and adolescent self-control (Davis et al, 2017; Karreman et al, 2006; Li et al, 2019; Pallini et al, 2018; Willems, Li, et al, 2018). Besides family, the school is another important developmental context for children when they start formal education (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Downer et al, 2010).…”
Self-control plays a significant role in child and adolescent development. The school environment is suggested as an important factor associated with individual differences in self-control. Among the many facets of school environment, school discipline is thought of as a critical factor that effectively develops students’ capacities for self-control. However, existing findings are mixed. To take stock of the literature, this meta-analysis summarizes the overall association between three school discipline components (i.e., structure, support, and teacher-student relationship) and self-control from preschoolers to high school students. Based on 68 studies reporting 278 effect sizes (N = 57,798), the results revealed that the overall effect size for the association between school discipline and self-control was small to medium (r = .190, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [.151, .229]). Moderator analyses showed that effect sizes were similar in magnitude across school discipline components, gender and age of students, region, report informant of school discipline measures, reliability of school discipline and self-control measures, and research design. The effect sizes were stronger for the studies using self-report measures to assess self-control (compared to studies using observation/tasks or other-informant measures) and for studies that examined general self-control (compared to cognitive self-control). Moreover, the effect sizes for the association between school discipline and social-emotional self-control were stronger for older students. These findings point to the importance of school discipline associated with individual differences in self-control in students from preschool to high school.
“…Such imbalances in the development of self-control underline the need to examine the role of different types of self-control in the “school discipline–self-control” association. Therefore, in this study, we not only operationalize self-control as general self-control, as many other meta-analyses about self-control did (De Ridder et al, 2012; Li et al, 2019; Willems et al, 2019; Willems, Li, et al, 2018), but we also differentiate between different types of self-control and examine whether the type of self-control moderates the association between school discipline and self-control.…”
Section: Conceptualization Of School Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although self-control has biological underpinnings, existing studies have also suggested that self-control can be substantially shaped by the environment (Willems, Dolan, et al, 2018; Willems et al, 2019). Many studies have considered family as the primary context that nurtures child and adolescent self-control (Davis et al, 2017; Karreman et al, 2006; Li et al, 2019; Pallini et al, 2018; Willems, Li, et al, 2018). Besides family, the school is another important developmental context for children when they start formal education (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; Downer et al, 2010).…”
Self-control plays a significant role in child and adolescent development. The school environment is suggested as an important factor associated with individual differences in self-control. Among the many facets of school environment, school discipline is thought of as a critical factor that effectively develops students’ capacities for self-control. However, existing findings are mixed. To take stock of the literature, this meta-analysis summarizes the overall association between three school discipline components (i.e., structure, support, and teacher-student relationship) and self-control from preschoolers to high school students. Based on 68 studies reporting 278 effect sizes (N = 57,798), the results revealed that the overall effect size for the association between school discipline and self-control was small to medium (r = .190, p < .001, 95% confidence interval [.151, .229]). Moderator analyses showed that effect sizes were similar in magnitude across school discipline components, gender and age of students, region, report informant of school discipline measures, reliability of school discipline and self-control measures, and research design. The effect sizes were stronger for the studies using self-report measures to assess self-control (compared to studies using observation/tasks or other-informant measures) and for studies that examined general self-control (compared to cognitive self-control). Moreover, the effect sizes for the association between school discipline and social-emotional self-control were stronger for older students. These findings point to the importance of school discipline associated with individual differences in self-control in students from preschool to high school.
“…Yet, not all individuals develop the same levels of selfcontrol, which begs the question: 'where do these individual differences come from?'. While the effects of the environment on such individual differences are well documented (Bridgett et al, 2015;Pallini et al, 2018;Willems et al, 2018b), the research on genetic influences on selfcontrol is more nascent. The aim of this study is therefore to perform a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative overview of the heritability of self-control.…”
Self-control is the ability to control one’s impulses when faced with challenges or temptations, and is robustly associated with physiological and psychological well-being. Twin studies show that self-control is heritable, but estimates range between 0% and 90%, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative overview of the heritability of self-control. A systematic search resulted in 31 included studies, based on a sample size of >100.000 individuals, published between 1996 and 2018. Our results revealed an overall monozygotic twin correlation of .58, and an overall dizygotic twin correlation of .28, resulting in a heritability estimate of 60%. The heritability of self-control did not vary across gender or age. The heritability did differ across informants, with stronger heritability estimates based on parent report versus self-report or observations. This finding provides evidence that when aiming to understand individual differences in self-control, one should take genetic factors into account. Recommendations for future research are discussed.
“…In addition, these parental practices have been associated with serious behavioral and psychosocial adjustment problems in adolescents, variables that are closely linked to violence in couple relationships [25]. By contrast, the behaviors and attitudes that represent healthy family functioning (cohesion, support, and positive communication) are related to good psychological and emotional development in the children [26,27].…”
The relationship between parenting styles and teen dating violence has become a relevant research topic in recent years, especially related to violence inflicted online. To more fully understand this relationship, the objective of the present study was to examine which parenting style (authoritarian, indulgent, authoritative, or neglectful) best protects against dating violence in adolescent relationships. A total of 1132 adolescents of both sexes participated in this study (46.4% boys and 53.6% girls), with ages between 14 and 18 years old (M = 15.6, SD = 1.3). A multivariate factorial design was applied (MANOVA, 4 × 2), using the parenting style, the parents’ gender, and the adolescents’ gender as independent variables, and the dating violence dimensions (online and offline) as dependent variables. As the results show, the lowest scores on all the dating violence dimensions examined were obtained by adolescents from indulgent families. In addition, three interaction effects were observed between the mother’s parenting style and the adolescent’s gender on online violence (e-violence and control), and the father’s parenting style on offline violence (verbal-emotional). Thus, adolescents with authoritarian mothers obtained the highest scores on violence and control inflicted online, respectively, and adolescent girls with authoritarian fathers obtained the highest scores on verbal-emotional violence. These findings suggest that the indulgent style is the parenting style that protects against violence in teen dating relationships, and they also highlight the risks of the authoritarian style as a family child-rearing model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.