The Relationship Between Dysfunctional Interpersonal Tendencies, Derailment Potential Behavior, and Turnover

Carson, Marisa Adelman; Shanock, Linda R.; Heggestad, Eric D.; Andrew, Ashley M.; Pugh, S. Douglas; Walter, M. Allan

doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9239-0

Cited by 39 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Emotional volatility is often discussed in the context of leadership derailing (Carson et al, 2012;Kaiser & Hogan, 2007;Yukl, 2012), and conceptualization of the opposite idea, emotional stability, is often related to leadership emergence and effectiveness (Hogan & Kaiser, 2005;Hogan et al, 1994;Judge et al, 2002). Leader types that rely on emotional displays often, such as charismatic and ideological leaders, would be the most likely leader types to be perceived as emotionally volatile, but Judge and Bono (2000) found no relationship between charismatic leaders and neuroticism.…”

Section: Perceptions Of Leaders' Emotional Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

How outstanding leaders lead with affect: An examination of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders

Griffith

Connelly

Thiel

et al. 2015

The Leadership Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frameworks for understanding outstanding leadership have flourished in the past decade. Research into the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership in particular has examined how leaders develop mental models, frame visions, communicate goals, and utilize political tactics to form relationships with followers and impact society in meaningful ways. However, a discussion of how these types of leaders use emotions and influence tactics to influence followers and affect society is notably absent in the literature. To fill this gap, the current effort focuses on how charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders differ in their use of emotional displays and influence tactics. Results suggest that the emotional displays and influence tactics that leaders use successfully discriminate between CIP leader types and create expected leader styles. Implications of these findings are also discussed.

show abstract

Section: Perceptions Of Leaders' Emotional Displaysmentioning

confidence: 99%

How outstanding leaders lead with affect: An examination of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders

Griffith

Connelly

Thiel

et al. 2015

The Leadership Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The final set of regressions attempted to overcome some Type II errors by using the "higher order" classification of the HDS as done in other studies (Carson et al, 2012). In one set of regression the HDS factors were the independent variables and the four MBTI dimensions the dependent variables and in the other analysis this was reversed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fico, Hogan and Hogan (2000) report coefficient alphas between .50 and .70 with an average of .64 and test-retest reliabilities (n = 60) over a three-month interval ranging from .50 to .80, with an average of .68 There were no mean-level differences between sexes, racial/ethnic groups, or younger versus older persons (Hogan & Hogan, 2001). Various studies have used the HDS and have shown it to be a robust, reliable and valid instrument (Carson, Shanock, Heggestad, Andrew, Pugh, & Walter, 2012;De Fruyt et al, 2009;Furnham, 2006;Furnham & Crump, 2005;Harms, Spain, & Hannah, 2011;Khoo & Burch, 2008;Rolland & De Fruyt, 2003). …”

Section: Measurementioning

confidence: 99%

The Dark Side of the MBTI: Psychological Type and Interpersonal Derailers

Furnham¹,

Crump²

2014

PSYCH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over 4000 British adults completed the Hogan Development Survey (HDS) (Hogan & Hogan, 1997) which measures eleven potential derailment behaviours ("dark side" traits) based on the personality disorders and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Briggs & Myers, 1987) a famous measure of "normal" personality functioning. In all, five of the eleven "dark side" traits were correlated with the Extraversion-Introversion dimensions, none with Sensing-Intuition, seven with Thinking-Feeling and four with the Judging-Perceiving scale. Correlations were modest. Regressions with the four MBTI scales as criterion variables showed nine of the HDS factors were related to the T-F scale and accounted for 12% of the variance. Thinking types tended to be Sceptical, Reserved and Diligent. Overall correlations were low suggesting the MBTI assesses some aspects of dark side traits.

show abstract

“…This has however been updated by more recent meta-analyses and experimental studies. [7], using 15 independent samples, found five disorders relatively strongly related to N: Borderline, Avoidant, Dependent, Schizotypal and Paranoid [8], using 16 samples in their review, highlighted six PDs associated with N in rank order: Borderline (all six facets), Avoidant, Dependent, Paranoid, Schizotypal and Schizoid. The N facet that seemed most closely associated with the PDs was N3 Depressiveness and that least associated was N5 Impulsivity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dark Side of Poor Adjustment: Personality Disorders and Trait Neuroticism

Adrian¹

2017

J Depress Anxiety

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Relationship Between Dysfunctional Interpersonal Tendencies, Derailment Potential Behavior, and Turnover

Cited by 39 publications

References 31 publications

How outstanding leaders lead with affect: An examination of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders

How outstanding leaders lead with affect: An examination of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders

The Dark Side of the MBTI: Psychological Type and Interpersonal Derailers

The Dark Side of Poor Adjustment: Personality Disorders and Trait Neuroticism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About