1981
DOI: 10.4141/cjps81-060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Cell Size, Yield, and Sucrose Concentration of the Sugarbeet Root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In sugar beet yield as well as cell size were shown to be negatively correlated with sucrose content (Doney, 1979 ;Doney et al ., 1981) . Doney & Theurer (1983) showed that cell diameter and sucrose concentration showed little midparent heterosis, whereas a later study (Doney & Theurer, 1985) allowed the conclusion that beet root heterosis is due primarily to increases in cell number .…”
Section: Other Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sugar beet yield as well as cell size were shown to be negatively correlated with sucrose content (Doney, 1979 ;Doney et al ., 1981) . Doney & Theurer (1983) showed that cell diameter and sucrose concentration showed little midparent heterosis, whereas a later study (Doney & Theurer, 1985) allowed the conclusion that beet root heterosis is due primarily to increases in cell number .…”
Section: Other Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rings with their phloem and parenchyma zones are critical for providing transport and sugar storage capacities (Artschwager, 1926; Draycott, 2006). No clear correlation with sugar yield was found for simple traits such as number and width of rings or parenchyma cell size at harvest (Draycott, 2006), even though several studies argued that, with shorter distances between phloem and storage tissues, a higher sucrose content should be achievable (Milford, 1973; Wyse, 1979; Doney et al, 1981). Also cDNA cloning of extracellular and vacuolar sucrose cleaving enzymes revealed a change in the mechanisms of the functional unloading pathways during the first weeks of beet development, and transcript profiles revealed developmental and metabolic changes at similar or later age (Godt and Roitsch, 2006; Bellin et al, 2007; Trebbi and Mcgrath, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-invasive approaches with rhizotrons (Gregory, 2006; Neumann et al, 2009) are not well suited to study solid volumetric (3D) structures or gain anatomical information on ring development. Linking structure and function and correlating them to yield or yield stability has proven to be difficult (Doney et al, 1981; Hoffmann, 2010), possibly due to the lack of detailed developmental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing root yields by plant breeding, genetic selection, nitrogen (N) fertilization, agronomic practices, and environmental conditions will generally decrease sucrose concentration (5,14). Milford (13) and Doney (7,8) where S ? smi is the sucrose yield change attributed to PSDM, S imi is the sucrose yield change attributed to dry matter, SWt 1 (PSDM 1 /100) x DM yd 1 , SWt 2 -(PSDM2/100) x DM yd 2 , SWt I E"2 (PSDM 1 /100) x DM yd 2 , DM yd is the dry matter yield, subscript 1 is the lower sucrose yield treatment, and subscript 2 is the higher sucrose yield treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%