The relationship between biodiversity and wetland cover varies across regions of the conterminous United States

Abstract

Identifying the factors that determine the spatial distribution of biodiversity is a major focus of ecological research. These factors vary with scale from interspecific interactions to global climatic cycles. Wetlands are important biodiversity hotspots and contributors of ecosystem services, but the association between proportional wetland cover and species richness has shown mixed results. It is not well known as to what extent there is a relationship between proportional wetland cover and species richness, especially at the sub-continental scale. We used the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) to model wetland cover for the conterminous United States and the National Land Cover Database to estimate wetland change between 2001 and 2011. We used a Bayesian spatial Poisson model to estimate a spatially varying coefficient surface describing the effect of proportional wetland cover on the distribution of amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles and the cumulative distribution of terrestrial endemic species. Species richness and wetland cover were significantly correlated, and this relationship varied both spatially and by taxonomic group. Rather than a continental-scale association, however, we found that this relationship changed more closely among ecoregions. The species richness of each of the five groups was positively associated with wetland cover in some or all of the Great Plains; additionally, a positive association was found for mammals in the Southeastern Plains and Piedmont of the eastern U.S. Model results indicated negative association especially in the Cold Deserts and Northern Lakes & Forests of Minnesota and Wisconsin, though these varied greatly between groups. Our results highlight the need for wetland conservation initiatives that focus efforts at the level II and III ecoregional scale rather than along political boundaries.

Waterbird–habitat relationships in South Carolina: implications for protection, restoration, and management of coastal and inland wetlands

“…We excluded GAP 4 properties because they had no known biodiversity conservation or protection mandate. Last, we removed ≤10 ha boundaries to eliminate erroneous features from the analysis (Dertien et al 2020). Of 1,617 km 2 of protected land area, we retained 87% of protected land and water (1,412 km 2 ; Fig.…”

Climate change will reduce North American inland wetland areas and disrupt their seasonal regimes

“…Inland wetlands are important freshwater resources and one of the most productive ecosystems on Earth 1 . Besides the importance for biodiversity 2 , inland wetlands play a critical role in global water, energy, and carbon cycles 3 . Specifically, inland wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH 4 ), the second most important atmospheric greenhouse gases 4 – 7 , and can sequester soil organic carbon at a rate much higher than many other ecosystems 8 .…”

Large fire initially reduces bird diversity in Poland’s largest wetland biodiversity hotspot

“…Freshwater ecosystems, including wetlands, are widely recognized as biodiversity hotspots for both plants and animals (Dertien et al 2020;Reid et al 2019). Although they cover only 0.8% of the world's land area, they host nearly 6% of all described animal species, including 33% of all vertebrates (Dudgeon et al 2006).…”