2016
DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2015.1122026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between aptitude and working memory: an instructed SLA context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Correlations between analytic language ability as tested by the Llama F and WM have been identified several times (Granena, 2013;Sáfár & Kormos, 2008;Yalcin, 2012;Yalcin, Cecen & Ercetin, 2016;Yilmaz, 2013). The present study, however, cannot confirm a relationship between WM and grammatical inferencing (Llama F).…”
Section: Working Memory and Phonetic Aptitudecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Correlations between analytic language ability as tested by the Llama F and WM have been identified several times (Granena, 2013;Sáfár & Kormos, 2008;Yalcin, 2012;Yalcin, Cecen & Ercetin, 2016;Yilmaz, 2013). The present study, however, cannot confirm a relationship between WM and grammatical inferencing (Llama F).…”
Section: Working Memory and Phonetic Aptitudecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Skehan's (1998) information processing view of aptitude also states that working memory is involved in many different stages of language acquisition. Studies investigating the relationship between the LLAMA and working memory components include Granena (2013a), Yilmaz (2013), Jackson (2014), Azizi (2015), and Yalcin, Cencen, and Ercetin (2016). In Granena's (2013a) validation study, LLAMA D displayed a weak association with working memory in a principal component analysis (r = .35 with a working memory dominated principal component), whereas the other three LLAMA subtests seemed unrelated to working memory.…”
Section: Language Aptitude and The Llama Test Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As LLAMA was originally developed for exploratory and non-high-stakes purposes (Meara, 2005), it is necessary to assess its reliability and validity. Such investigations have recently commenced, and potential and limits are gradually emerging (Bokander & Bylund, 2019;Granena, 2013aGranena, , 2019Rogers et al, 2017;Yalçın et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%