2015
DOI: 10.1121/1.4929934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between aircraft noise exposure and day-use visitor survey responses in backcountry areas of national parks

Abstract: To evaluate the relationship between aircraft noise exposure and the quality of national park visitor experience, more than 4600 visitor surveys were collected at seven backcountry sites in four U.S. national parks simultaneously with calibrated sound level measurements. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate parameters describing the relationship among visitor responses, aircraft noise dose metrics, and mediator variables. For the regression models, survey responses were converted to three dichot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative effects of noise on a range of animal species, ecological communities, and human visitors in protected areas are well documented (Rapoza et al . ; Shannon et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The negative effects of noise on a range of animal species, ecological communities, and human visitors in protected areas are well documented (Rapoza et al . ; Shannon et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effects of noise on a range of animal species, ecological communities, and human visitors in protected areas are well documented (Rapoza et al 2015;Shannon et al 2016). Noise that overlaps in frequency with important natural signals compromises a primary sensory system for wildlife (Swaddle et al 2015) and people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the second case study, we chose to examine audibility, as it may determine a minimum level of impact (i.e., audible or not). However, audibility will depend on species, individual, and even the degree of attention paid by an individual animal to the noise source (Fay 1988;Rapoza, Sudderth & Lewis 2015). Furthermore, a sound may be audible without necessarily causing any negative effects (Rapoza, Sudderth & Lewis 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%