2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05171-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A stochastic simulation model for assessing the masking effects of road noise for wildlife, outdoor recreation, and bioacoustic monitoring

Abstract: Traffic noise is one of the leading causes of reductions in animal abundances near roads. Acoustic masking of conspecific signals and adventitious cues is one mechanism that likely causes animals to abandon loud areas. However, masking effects can be difficult to document in situ and the effects of infrequent noise events may be impractical to study. Here, we present the Soundscapes model, a stochastic individual-based model that dynamically models the listening areas of animals searching for acoustic resource… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to expectation (Table S1a), however, detections of the Ryukyu scops owl (Otus elegans) were also unaffected. Given that acoustic surveys cannot differentiate between cases where a species is not producing sound and those where that species is not present (Toth et al, 2022), we cannot say with certainty that H. diphone populations declined following the typhoons. Regardless, our detected post-typhoon declines in H. diphone vocalizations-either through behavioral changes, distributional shifts, or local mortalitywere consistent across >80% of the field sites in which this species was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Contrary to expectation (Table S1a), however, detections of the Ryukyu scops owl (Otus elegans) were also unaffected. Given that acoustic surveys cannot differentiate between cases where a species is not producing sound and those where that species is not present (Toth et al, 2022), we cannot say with certainty that H. diphone populations declined following the typhoons. Regardless, our detected post-typhoon declines in H. diphone vocalizations-either through behavioral changes, distributional shifts, or local mortalitywere consistent across >80% of the field sites in which this species was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Automated vocalisation detections of the Japanese bush warbler ( Horornis diphone ) declined after the typhoons, while those of the large-billed crow ( Corvus macrorhynchos ) and Ryukyu scops owl ( Otus elegans ) did not. Given that acoustic surveys cannot differentiate between cases where a species is not producing sound and those where that species is not present (Toth et al, 2022), we cannot say with certainty that H. diphone populations declined following the typhoons. Regardless, our detected post-typhoon declines in H. diphone vocalisations—either through behavioural changes, distributional shifts, or local mortality—were consistent across >80% of the field sites in which this species was detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying speciesspecific vocalisations from acoustic recordings provides evidence for species presence at a given time and location, but determining true absences is more challenging. A species might not be vocalising because it is not present, its vocalisation was masked (Box 1), or it was simply too quiet to be detected (Toth et al, 2022). Detectability of certain species also changes with seasonal and environmental factors (Medina & Francis, 2012).…”
Section: Temporal Resolution and Scalementioning
confidence: 99%