2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00037-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore discussion about the relation between computer access, computer competencies and computer attitudes seems to have been shifted from computer access to the 'quality' of computer experience (McIlroy, Bunting, Tierney, & Gordon, 2001). This is an indication that access to technology tools is not a strong predictor in determining teachers' use of technology in instruction in these countries.…”
Section: Access To Technology Tools (Tools)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore discussion about the relation between computer access, computer competencies and computer attitudes seems to have been shifted from computer access to the 'quality' of computer experience (McIlroy, Bunting, Tierney, & Gordon, 2001). This is an indication that access to technology tools is not a strong predictor in determining teachers' use of technology in instruction in these countries.…”
Section: Access To Technology Tools (Tools)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) anxiety related to machines themselves; It has been found that women reported greater computer anxiety and lower computer self-efficacy than men (Yaghi and Abu-Saba, 1998;Durndell and Haag, 2000;Chou, 2003) while a number of studies found no significant difference in the mean scores of CARS by gender (Anderson, 1996;McLlroy et al, 2001;North and Noyes, 2002). Weil and Rosen (1995) examined technological sophistication and the level of technophobia using, among other instruments, CARS-C, a slightly modified scale of CARS.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, men and boys are more intensive users of the Internet, enjoy more competitive forms of e-learning, and encounter different problems while using ICT, compared with women and girls (Colley, 2003;Copper & Weaver, 2003;Volman & Eck, 2001;Volman, Eck, Heemskerk, & Kuiper, 2005). Moreover, several investigations indicated that gender gaps probably became more latent and more complex (Colley, 2003;McIlroy, Bunting, Tierney & Gordon, 2001;Mitra, Lenzmeier, Steffensmeier, Avon, Qu & Hazen, 2001). While gender differences in ICT related attitudes and cognitions disappeared at scale level, they seem to persist at factor level (McIlroy et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several investigations indicated that gender gaps probably became more latent and more complex (Colley, 2003;McIlroy, Bunting, Tierney & Gordon, 2001;Mitra, Lenzmeier, Steffensmeier, Avon, Qu & Hazen, 2001). While gender differences in ICT related attitudes and cognitions disappeared at scale level, they seem to persist at factor level (McIlroy et al, 2001). In addition, female and male students are likely to be different in terms of the types of computer use rather than in all areas of ICT application (Colley, 2003;Mitra et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%