2003
DOI: 10.1002/per.494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach

Abstract: The relationship between Big Five personality (measured by the NEO‐PI) and prejudice was examined using a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach. Big Five scores were related to a generalized prejudice factor based on seven different prejudice scales (racial prejudice, sexism, etc). A correlation analysis disclosed that Openness to Experience and Agreeableness were significantly related to prejudice, and a multiple regression analysis showed that a variable‐centred approach displayed a substantial cross‐valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
143
0
15

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
17
143
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there are numerous empirical studies which reinforce Allport's thesis by demonstrating that prejudice generalizes across different target groups (e.g., Akrami, Ekehammar, and Bergh, 2011;Altemeyer, 1998;Ekehammar and Akrami, 2003;Zick et al, 2008). Indeed, one of the rare longitudinal studies on group-focused enmity revealed that the level and longitudinal change pattern of negative attitudes toward different minority groups are similar .…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To date, there are numerous empirical studies which reinforce Allport's thesis by demonstrating that prejudice generalizes across different target groups (e.g., Akrami, Ekehammar, and Bergh, 2011;Altemeyer, 1998;Ekehammar and Akrami, 2003;Zick et al, 2008). Indeed, one of the rare longitudinal studies on group-focused enmity revealed that the level and longitudinal change pattern of negative attitudes toward different minority groups are similar .…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, studies done so far have mostly dealt with racism and the generalized factor of prejudice (e.g. Duriez & Soenens, 2006;Ekehammar & Akrami, 2003;Flynn, 2005). A wide range of different prejudice domains (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Éstos resultados permiten corroborar la segunda, tercera y cuarta hipótesis propuestas en el presente estudio, permitiendo dar cuenta que tal y como es sugerido desde una perspectiva motivacional (Duckitt, 2001; Duckitt y Sibley, 2007, 2010) y en el marco de las relaciones intergrupales, no se puede continuar analizando al prejuicio generalizado como un fenómeno unidimensional (Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswick, Levinson y Sanford, 1950; Altemeyer, 1981Altemeyer, , 1988, explicado indistintamente a partir del autoritarismo del ala de derechas y la orientación a la dominancia social (Altemeyer, 1996; Ekehammer y Akrami, 2003). Por el contrario, es necesario analizar la independencia de estas variables como predictoras del prejuicio generalizado, a partir del rol subyacente a nivel motivacional de la percepción de ciertos grupos como peligrosos, derogados o disidentes (Duckitt, 2001;Duckitt y Sibley, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified