2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00126-009-0255-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between Cu/Au ratio and formation depth of porphyry-style Cu–Au ± Mo deposits

Abstract: Constraints on gold and copper ore grades in porphyry-style Cu-Au ± Mo deposits are re-examined, with particular emphasis on published fluid pressure and formation depth as indicated by fluid inclusion data and geological reconstruction. Defining an arbitrary subdivision at a molar Cu/Au ratio of 4.0×10 4 , copper-gold deposits have a shallower average depth of formation (2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A), can yield oscillatory patterns in Au solubility in the T-P space (depending on the Fe/S ratio in the degassing magmatic fluid and the degree of fluid interaction with alkali aluminosilicate rocks). Such patterns contribute, along with other possible factors evoked so far, such as magma-fluid and vapor-brine separation (3,16,30), to the large spatial variations of Au grades and Au/Cu ratios reported between porphyry deposits. Furthermore, the S − 3 may also control incorporation of Au in a chemically bound state into pyrite, which is the major Au host of many epithermal and Carlin-type deposits (8,38).…”
Section: Discussion and Geological And Metallogenic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…3A), can yield oscillatory patterns in Au solubility in the T-P space (depending on the Fe/S ratio in the degassing magmatic fluid and the degree of fluid interaction with alkali aluminosilicate rocks). Such patterns contribute, along with other possible factors evoked so far, such as magma-fluid and vapor-brine separation (3,16,30), to the large spatial variations of Au grades and Au/Cu ratios reported between porphyry deposits. Furthermore, the S − 3 may also control incorporation of Au in a chemically bound state into pyrite, which is the major Au host of many epithermal and Carlin-type deposits (8,38).…”
Section: Discussion and Geological And Metallogenic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…It is apparent on Fig. 11, that the expected Cu/Au ratios in the exsolving volatile phase are significantly lower in relatively reducing systems (fO 2 < NNO+1) than those found in porphyry type ore deposits (Murakami et al, 2010), while at higher fO 2 , the predicted Cu/Au ratios fall in the typical range of ore deposits. Consequently, the volatile input from underlying mafic magmas into the magmatichydrothermal environment will be indicated by low Cu/ Au ratios in the forming ore deposits.…”
Section: Geological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, despite large variations 819 of Cu/Au ratios in porphyry-style Cu-Au-Mo deposits (from 10 3 to 10 6 ), they roughly increase with depth 820 (Murakami et al, 2010). This was qualitatively interpreted by the more efficient precipitation of 821 chalcopyrite than gold from an ascending cooling magmatic fluid carrying Cu in the form of chloride 822 complexes, whereas Au remained in the fluid as soluble sulfide species (Murakami et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%