2019
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2019.1640580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reference value of blood lead level among the general adult population of eastern Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…46 The average blood lead levels for these countries were lower than in our study. Whereas, the studies were presented that the mean blood lead concentrations for German and Iran populations were 3.07 µg/dL 47 and 5.11±7.41 µg/dL, 48 respectively, and the median level for China was 4.40 µg/dL, 19 which is relatively higher than our result.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…46 The average blood lead levels for these countries were lower than in our study. Whereas, the studies were presented that the mean blood lead concentrations for German and Iran populations were 3.07 µg/dL 47 and 5.11±7.41 µg/dL, 48 respectively, and the median level for China was 4.40 µg/dL, 19 which is relatively higher than our result.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The prevalence of EBLL among the study participants was 84.5%. Occupation was a significant predictor of EBLL in our study, a finding that is supported by several other studies that associated EBLLs and lead poisoning with occupational exposure [ 1 , 12 , 13 ]. Blood transfusion has been considered a possible source of lead exposure [ 5 , 14 ], it is worrying that in this study, the prevalence of EBLL for apparently healthy blood donors was 65%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It shows these studies were performed in more contaminated locations since Tehran and Semnan are industrial cities with higher air pollution. Besides, In Iran, the leaded gasoline was extensively used until January 2002 [ 37 ] and accounted for higher BLC in those studies. Different periods separated by nine and 15 years from the current study, the different age range of studies, and greater exposure to some sources of lead can explain the differences observed in these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%